[CPWG] On adult websites, inertia, and basic fairness

[Bill Jouris]

Hi Evan, 
In response to your question: To what extent should ALAC be serving as ICANN's process police?
I think the answer should be: "To the extent that the failure to follow ICANN's process in a particular instance had a negative impact on end users." 
In the cases here, the contract requirements which were not followed were, if I understand correctly, intended to protect end users.  We might, of course, decide that those provisions were not fit for purpose, and so not worth our time to raise the issue.  
But if we think they were appropriate (at least at the time), I think we have an obligation to raise the issue.  
Regards, 
Bill Jouris 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 7:41 AM, Evan Leibovitch via CPWG<cpwg at icann.org> wrote:   _______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20240421/ce16c992/attachment.html>