[client com] CCWG Draft Proposal - CWG Items

Thu Apr 30 22:00:30 UTC 2015

Yes. Thank you Greg and Client Committee. I¹m sorry for any confusion.

From:  Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>
Reply-To:  Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>
Date:  Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 5:58 PM
To:  Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [client com] CCWG Draft Proposal - CWG Items

Grace has confirmed to me that it is already being incorporated into the
upcoming V10.

Greg

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Client Committee List for CWG
<cwg-client at icann.org> wrote:
> From my point of view, the Sidley edits are helpful in clarify and better
> articulating the position.
>  
> I have only one reservation and that is the with respect to the role of the
> ccNSO & GNSO in the escalation process.
> I think the document captures what is currently envisaged but personally, I am
> not yet confident that this is the right answer.
> However, on the basis that this accurately represents the current position of
> the CWG, I believe it should be retained as is in the updated document as
> provided from Sidley.
>  
> Greg, please confirm that you will communicate this redlined version / update
> to the CCWG?
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> From: Client Committee List for CWG [mailto:cwg-client at icann.org]
> Sent: 30 April 2015 21:23
> To: Client
> Subject: Re: [client com] CCWG Draft Proposal - CWG Items
>  
> 
> I am reviewing this now.
> 
>  
> 
> Greg
> 
>  
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Client Committee List for CWG
> <cwg-client at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> Attached are excerpts from the draft CCWG proposal (v9) that relate to CWG,
> and Sidley¹s proposed edits and questions relating to those sections.  These
> edits are marked against the current CCWG draft.
>  
> Best regards,
> Sharon
>  
> SHARON FLANAGAN
> Partner
> 
> Sidley Austin LLP
> +1.415.772.1271 <tel:%2B1.415.772.1271>
> sflanagan at sidley.com
>  
> 
> From:cwg-client-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-client-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Client Committee List for CWG
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 6:49 AM
> To: Client
> Subject: Re: [client com] CWG - Updated "Punch List"
>  
> 
> I would note one other agenda item requested by Sharon:
> 
>  
> 
> One other agenda item we would like to add to our call is a discussion of the
> current CCWG proposal.  There is a discussion in that document of CWG
> requirements which is based on the co-chairs memo from mid-April.  To the
> extent the CWG draft proposal expanded these requirements or provided
> additional detail, do we want to specifically comment on this from the CWG
> perspective? 
> 
>  
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Jonathan,
> 
>  
> 
> I think that should not be a problem.  Other than the punch list, I don't
> think we have any significant issues or items to cover.  I could also use an
> extra half-hour of my life back....
> 
>  
> 
> Greg
> 
>  
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Client Committee List for CWG
> <cwg-client at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Greg,
>  
> Lise and I both have additional commitments after 30 minutes. So Š hopefully
> we can be prompt and functional and work within a 30 minute window if possible
> please.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> 
> From: Client Committee List for CWG [mailto:cwg-client at icann.org]
> Sent: 29 April 2015 17:22
> To: 'cwg-client at icann.org'
> 
> 
> Subject: Re: [client com] CWG - Updated "Punch List"
> 
>  
> Hi Greg,
>  
> It would be good to discuss this tomorrow on our standing client committee
> call.  We don¹t think we need to go through in detail, but we should discuss
> at a high level the approach on resolving some of the open points.
>  
> One other agenda item we would like to add to our call is a discussion of the
> current CCWG proposal.  There is a discussion in that document of CWG
> requirements which is based on the co-chairs memo from mid-April.  To the
> extent the CWG draft proposal expanded these requirements or provided
> additional detail, do we want to specifically comment on this from the CWG
> perspective? 
>  
> Thanks,
> Sharon
>  
> SHARON FLANAGAN
> Partner
> 
> Sidley Austin LLP
> +1.415.772.1271 <tel:%2B1.415.772.1271>
> sflanagan at sidley.com
>  
> 
> From:cwg-client-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-client-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Client Committee List for CWG
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 9:04 AM
> To: Client
> Subject: Re: [client com] CWG - Updated "Punch List"
>  
> 
> Sharon,
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you very much for this.  Can you let us know if you think we need a
> Client Committee call tomorrow to discuss this.  Also, please let us know if
> there are any other topics you would want to raise, if we have a client
> committee call tomorrow.
> 
>  
> 
> Greg
> 
>  
> 
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Client Committee List for CWG
> <cwg-client at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> Attached is a draft of the updated ³punch list² (open items) for CWG
> consideration.
>  
> Best regards,
> Sharon
>  
>  
> SHARON FLANAGAN
> Partner
> Sidley Austin LLP
> 555 California Street
> Suite 2000
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> +1.415.772.1271 <tel:%2B1.415.772.1271>
> sflanagan at sidley.com
> www.sidley.com <http://www.sidley.com>
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> ******************************************************************************
> **********************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
> 
> ******************************************************************************
> **********************
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-client mailing list
> Cwg-client at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_lis
> tinfo_cwg-2Dclient&d=AwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=M3rwsTyNMTsSrNjjl2wpjY1
> sQALn2rPpcxAK31O8xYk&m=BQImNUstMM_9BGdNHM6KK2TrdTofERNU0dsbjpJ_LPQ&s=0aYMcdXZP
> 9_DAO46-P9XGeFN6pDxyrtG-TKP3XJW3Sc&e=>
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-client mailing list
> Cwg-client at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_lis
> tinfo_cwg-2Dclient&d=AwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=M3rwsTyNMTsSrNjjl2wpjY1
> sQALn2rPpcxAK31O8xYk&m=Ghx9RKUWuEjdr681ThmlmLgbDSGIXXDiZCTB4doei4E&s=Y6MXvRdzK
> hOAnYr3x-Q0IZdPqUkex2g7yyVIGGMqE74&e=>
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-client mailing list
> Cwg-client at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cwg-client mailing list
> Cwg-client at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150430/d82c993e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/attachments/20150430/d82c993e/smime-0001.p7s>