[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday December 3rd

[Bertrand de La Chapelle]

+1 with Greg.

B.

"*Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes*", Antoine de
Saint Exupéry
("*There is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans*")BERTRAND DE
LA CHAPELLEInternet & Jurisdiction Project | Director

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with everybody.  It's definitely helpful.  At the same time, we
> should consciously avoid privileging early comments in any fashion.  If
> these first submissions are any indication, that might not be too difficult.
>
> We should also avoid the opposite. I seem to recall discussions in my
> college psych courses of two cognitive biases: the "primacy effect" and the
> "recency effect." While this is not really the same thing, it may be a
> useful analogy.  Milton cautions us against something analogous to the
> "primacy effect," if I recall correctly.  We should also caution ourselves
> against something like the "recency effect."  In other words, we should not
> let the order in which comments come in influence our attention to them.
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
>>  As you would probably guess my previous comment Milton, I disagree.  It
>> is not perfect but for me I find it helpful.  Anyone who doesn’t find it
>> helpful can ignore it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
>> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Milton L Mueller
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 03, 2014 10:47 AM
>> *To:* Bernard Turcotte; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for
>> Wednesday December 3rd
>>
>>
>>
>> Appreciate the attempt but I am not sure this is a good idea. If this
>> public comment period is like every one I have ever seen before, 90% of the
>> comments will come on the day of the deadline or perhaps a day before. The
>> running log therefore kind of privileges early comments as they trickle in.
>> Then we will be hit with a deluge at the end anyway. Might be better to
>> look at all comments after they all come in.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Bernard
>> Turcotte
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 3, 2014 9:35 AM
>> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday
>> December 3rd
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> This will be part of a daily log of public comments to assist us on in
>> keeping track of the various postings.
>>
>>
>>
>> Comments on how to improve this welcome.
>>
>>
>>
>> B.,
>>
>>
>>
>> For December 2nd we have the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> *Date*
>>
>> *From*
>>
>> *Summary*
>>
>> *20141202*
>>
>> *Page Howe*
>>
>> *Current system with NTIA is doing a good job and wants it maintained.*
>>
>> *20141202*
>>
>> * Graham Schreiber*
>>
>> *Garbled paste into body of comment*
>>
>> *20141202*
>>
>> * Graham Schreiber*
>>
>> *Refers to a US supreme court case about .com (?) involving a number of
>> parties including ICANN and suggesting that the transition work not proceed
>> until this is resolved.*
>>
>> A cumulative of these summaries is provided as an Excel file - attached.
>>
>>
>>
>> B.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141203/1e77f326/attachment.html>