[CWG-Stewardship] Principles

[Greg Shatan]

I agree with Wolf-Ulrich on the "separability should persist."  The
perpetual nature of this bothered me as well.  (I agree on the other two
points, too, but I dealt with them in my revised draft, I believe.)

Greg

*Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab*

*666 Third Avenue **ï** New York, NY 10017-5621*

*Direct*  212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022

*Fax*  212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428

*gsshatan at lawabel.com <gsshatan at lawabel.com>*

*ICANN-related: gregshatanipc at gmail.com <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> *

*www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>*

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:14 AM, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
wrote:

>   I agree to Chuck’s edits:
>
> - f.vi. should be deleted. I can’t recognize a difference in value
> compared to the chapeau text.
>
> - h.: My concern is with the last sentence “separability should
> persist...”) since it claims for an eternal fixing which I never would dare
> to implement. It should be deleted in my opinion.
>
> - g. (Multistakehoder principle): numbering should be “i.”. I also concur
> with Milton. Isn’t here “governance” more appropriate than “management”?
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>  *From:* Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 10:18 PM
> *To:* Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr at difo.dk> ; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>
>
> I made a couple more edits in item g at the end of the document.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 4:12 PM
> *To:* 'Lise Fuhr'; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>
>
>
> I made a couple edits and suggested a third in my next to last comment.  I
> also identified in my comments some possible action items that the CWG may
> need to perform as soon as possible assuming that the principles are
> adopted by the CWG.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Lise Fuhr
> *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 8:34 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> We hereby send you a redline and a clean version of the Principles
> document. For the unresolved part, staff has done a table. We recommend
> that we focus on the outstanding issues, that are identified in the
> comments. We welcome any inputs on either the comments or on the redline
> draft. The document will be finalized on the next call.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martin and Lise
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141208/3c008a71/attachment.html>