[CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Is that 'transition to a "successor  contractor" plan' available to the CWG?

avri

On 17-Dec-14 05:26, Matthew Shears wrote:
> Alan
>
> Section C.7 in the current contract addresses issues of continuity of
> operations - particularly C.7.3, according to which ICANN should have
> a transition to a "successor
> contractor" plan in place at the moment
>
> Matthew
>
> On 12/17/2014 3:38 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>> As someone whose ICANN 'job" is supporting/defending the needs of
>> Internet users, I will point out that security and stability of the
>> IANA functions is of paramount importance for the ALAC as well.
>>
>> I look forward to the seeing how that can be assured in a potentially
>> disruptive switch of the IANA operator where it may be that there is
>> no continuity of either staff or systems.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> At 15/12/2014 03:16 PM, Donna Austin wrote:
>>
>>> All
>>>
>>> I largely agree with Christopher. I think we are creating complexity
>>> where it does not necessarily need to be, but as we are here I want
>>> to reiterate a few comments I made on the RFP 3 call earlier today,
>>> and these comments come from a gTLD registry operator perspective:
>>>
>>> ·         Operational stability and reliability of the IANA service
>>> is imperative to the business operations of registry operators and
>>> as such this should be a critical consideration in any discussions.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141217/f614a15c/attachment.html>