[CWG-Stewardship] FW: FW: CWG RFP2B Proposal

[Gomes, Chuck]

I keep starting to make the same mistake as Avri.  I suggest that the file naming be more carefully done to not duplicate the use of key RFP section names.  Using a RFP Subsection number like ‘2B’ in the file name for a principles document should be avoided going forward.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Guru Acharya
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 10:49 PM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: FW: CWG RFP2B Proposal

Avri - You got the wrong thread. This thread is for RFP2B and not the principles.

And your suggested principle for a multi-stakeholder composition of the oversight council appears to be in contradiction to Strawman 1 and ignores the range of discussions that happened on this list about the composition.

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
Hi,

I have suggested a few edits to the doc.  hope I did it in the mandated manner.

the changes refer to

- transparency and requirements that any and all audit reports be published.
- bottom-up modalities
- multistakeholder nature of any committee or oversight arrangements.

Hope I did not mess up any of the formatting.

avri

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141115/886f7f66/attachment.html>