[CWG-Stewardship] multistakeholder principle was Re: [] FW: FW: CWG ... 2B

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

Hello all,

On 15/11/2014 14:42, Avri Doria wrote:
> Therefore I maintain that accepting that the multistakeholder
> principle is fundamental in our work is essential and cannot be
> removed by solutionism .  As I said in another hand, if there is a
> concensus argument that on principle "one stakeholder should be more
> equal than all other stakeholders," then that should be set down as
> the principle.  I do not believe I have seen that consensus.

For the record, I personally agree with Avri's point. I have kept quiet
so far because the At-Large WG on this topic is currently undertaking a
poll of its members to find out what *our* consensus points are wrt the
strawman proposals - and will bring these to Frankfurt.
Kind regards,

Olivier