[CWG-Stewardship] [] A new proposed US bill?

Milton L Mueller mueller at syr.edu
Sun Nov 23 17:11:06 UTC 2014


Agree with Avri. Once we have an agreed approach to the solution we can brief Washington DC people.
Before that, we could actually be exacerbating the perception of some in DC that NTIA's exit leads to uncertainty and risk.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 10:43 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] [] A new proposed US bill?

Hi,
On 23-Nov-14 00:35, Allan MacGillivray wrote:

Robert - I agree that we have to pay very close attention to what is going on in DC.  We should consider briefing Congressional staffers ourselves to supplement what ICANN may be saying.

Wouldn't this be something to do once we had a solution we could argue was a community wide consensus decision.

As far as I can tell we are not there yet, and perhaps not even close.

avri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141123/3c50debc/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list