[CWG-Stewardship] My concerns with the draft proposal and an alternative option

[Alan Greenberg]

Milton, I do not know of ANY ALAC or At-Large participants in the 
process who are opponents of strong ICANN accountability.

Just because we do not agree with you that the ONLY way to achieve 
strong accountability is to be able to pull the IANA contract does 
not imply that we are against other forms of strong accountability.

In fact, what we favour would not only ensure strong accountability 
for IANA functions, but for other aspects of ICANN as well - 
something that the proposal that you favour would not do.

Please do not incorrectly characterize our position.

Alan

At 29/11/2014 01:02 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
>If we roll back to square one, as some of the opponents of strong 
>accountability in ALAC wish to do, what exactly would the CCWG be 
>able to do in their track one deliberations? They would indeed be 
>working in a vacuum.
>
>--MM