[CWG-Stewardship] DT-X RFC Mechanism or work by any other formalism

[Avri Doria]

Hi

Attached is a brief outline of a task definition, done in the form of
section III templates.

I understand that we may be past the creation of new DTs, however the
real issue is not the formalism we use to get the work done, but that
this gap be filled before we submit a report.

The driver doc (open to comments) is at:
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WvBqtgXJ7rNrbN-5Tjf5-gi80aZ2oRYDtF_JLrETRqg/edit?usp=sharing>

avri



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150414/d0a3f0e5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DT-XRFPmechanism.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 158573 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150414/d0a3f0e5/DT-XRFPmechanism-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DT-XRFPmechanism.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 6072 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150414/d0a3f0e5/DT-XRFPmechanism-0001.docx>