[CWG-Stewardship] FW: CWG/CRISP/IANAPLAN Coordination
Gomes, Chuck
cgomes at verisign.com
Wed Aug 12 12:34:29 UTC 2015
I agree with Avri regarding the composition of the 'chair's group'. I think having a few IPR experts in the small group is important.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 5:58 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: CWG/CRISP/IANAPLAN Coordination
Hi,
By chairs' group. i meant one that they were responsible for and were putting together as they thought best. I did not mean it would only contain chairs.
As for consensus, I hear more and more people saying things like, "while I would prefer ICANN hold on to the IPR and domain names as part of its stewardship role, as long as everything is worked out, I am willing to live with a trust solution since that is what Numbers wants and is what was put in the ICG plan as a default"
I think if the chairs group works it out and can answer the questions being asked to the satisfaction of the group, we will find consensus.
avri
On 11-Aug-15 15:07, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Hello Avri,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>
> I look forward to updates on the discussions that will be held in
> the chairs' group.
>
>
> If its indeed now "chairs' group" then i will add my +1. The
> understanding from the last CWG call was that a "small group" of
> selected person across the operational communities will be formed to
> discuss the TM(the group as i understand it may or may not contain the
> chairs).
>
> Overall, without a direction from the CWG i doubt this meeting would
> help the CWG achieve a consensus view on the TM options. I would
> however be glad to see this cross- operational community collaboration
> focus on how to refine the "texts/wordings" that ensure IETF Trust
> operates the TM in a manner acceptable by the operational communities.
>
>
> Good luck.
>
>
> +1
>
> Regards
>
>
> avri
>
>
> On 11-Aug-15 04:53, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Please see below for message received yesterday from Izumi
> Okutani & Nurani Nimpuno (respectively Chair and Vice-Chair of The
> CRISP Team)
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > -----
> > Dear Jonathan, Lise and CWG members,
> >
> >
> > The CRISP Team have started sharing observations on the legal
> input from Sidely.
> > Once we have completed summarising our obervation, we would like
> to share it with the CWG, together with any general observation on
> IPR on the IANA trademark and iana.org <http://iana.org> domain.
> >
> > We acknowledge the suggested way forward discussed at the CWG
> call on Thursday 6 August, which was shared by Jonathan and Lise.
> > We will discuss this suggestion as well and will get back to you
> through Jonathan and Lise if we have any feedback.
> >
> > Izumi Okutani & Nurani Nimpuno
> > Chair, Vice-Chair, The CRISP Team
> > -----
> >
> >
> > On 2015/08/07 16:27, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Following up from the latest email in this thread. I am able to
> report that the CWG received its legal input on the IPR on
> Wednesday this week.
> >> In addition, yesterday (Thursday 6th August) , at our scheduled
> CWG meeting, we had the lawyers present the work and we ran a Q&A
> / discussion.
> >> Please do consider listening to the audio recording of the
> meeting and / or reading the transcript as you see fit.
> >>
> >> In brief, the outcome was that the CWG requested the following
> of the chairs:
> >>
> >> 1. That we reach out to this group and communicate the current
> situation.
> >> 2. That we convene a meeting to discuss and consider the
> options for a way forward as soon as possible.
> >> 3. That we consider forming a small group, suggested to contain
> the group on this email plus possibly some additions (say up to 2
> per proposing group) and including a representative from ICANN.
> >> This small group would seek to reconcile the IPR issue across
> the CWG / CRISP / IANAPLAN and then put this reconciled position
> back to the Names, Numbers & Protocol communities.
> >> My personal opinion is that this should be all completed by the
> close of the ICG public comment period such that we can
> communicate it to the ICG directly.
> >>
> >> We have attached the legal input from Sidley Austin and look
> forward to your response as soon as possible, primarily to a
> request to meet to discuss this. Grace will send out a Doodle Poll
> shortly.
> >> Hopefully we can discuss the detail in a meeting once you have
> had a chance to review the input.
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan & Lise
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> /Seun Ojedeji,
> Federal University Oye-Ekiti
> web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
> Mobile: +2348035233535
> //alt email:<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <mailto:seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>/
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list