[CWG-Stewardship] CWG letter to CCWG

[Gomes, Chuck]

In the conclusion for item 7 we say: "This requirement could be addressed in a number of ways. For example, a provision could be added to the ICANN Bylaws that would require ICANN to enforce its rights under the ICANN-PTI Contract/Standard of Work (SOW),. . ."  I don't think it is too important but I wonder if it should say 'Statement of Work' instead of 'Standard of Work'?

I compliment everyone for all of the good work on this.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 11:30 AM
To: 'Flanagan, Sharon'; Gregory, Holly
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG letter to CCWG

Dear Sidley,

The CWG Stewardship has reviewed the draft letter and undertaken a series of edits to address various points.

We believe that the current draft, attached in both redline & clean format, deals with all of the issues raised prior to, during and after our discussion with you at the most recent CWG meeting.

Accordingly, please can you review the attached draft and prepare a final version, which may or may not include any further recommended changes from you, by 16h00 UTC Monday 21 December 2015.

We will then transmit that final version to the CCWG Co-Chairs, to the CCWG Chartering Organizations and into the CCWG Public Comment before the 23h59 deadline on Monday 21 December.

If you need additional time to prepare the final version (e.g. 18h00 UTC Monday), please let us know as soon as possible.

Thank-you,


Jonathan Robinson & Lise Fuhr
Co-chairs, CWG Stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20151219/a23912ee/attachment.html>