[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript RFP 4 28 January 14:00 UTC

Brenda Brewer brenda.brewer at icann.org
Wed Jan 28 15:55:36 UTC 2015



Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call on 22 January are available here:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51416935


Actions


Action SIVA: review document CCWG and merge with documents of this group. 

Action Siva:  Group /merge the tests/scenario's identified in similar way as WA 4 CCWG list.

*       Need to check whether scenario relevant for transition.Include in document , with
qualification, important , normal, not relevant in this context.

Action all: request if participants see a need to meet, if so , then use Doodle poll to set time.

*        Question: is there need for meeting before Singapore by this group? Response need on the
list by Friday 30 January 2015. 16.00 UTC.

Action staff : try to arrange meeting with BRC to seek information from them on  risks already
identified, and possibly relevant for RFP 4 group 


Notes


RFP 4 group call # 6

CWG Stewardship Transition 28 January 2015, 14.00-16.00 UTC

0. welcome/introduction.

Siva & Seun audio only

Assess work has been done to date, get updates, plan moving forward

1. review of tasks/minutes from last call

*       Update Siva on document on stress document and updates received:

*       To date no participation on stress test document. Members are requested to have alook at the
document.

2. review/updates from sub-workings groups on  timeline(s), stress tests

*       CCWG Accountability has been doing work on stress test and scenario's/ Suggestion to look at
the work of CCWG Accountability

*       OCL: Notes, potential of duplicating work.. Notes a limited number of scenarios, compared
with work of the CWG RFP 4.

 

Action SIVA: review document and merge with documents of this group. 

Include in document , with qualification, important , normal, not relevant in this context.

Based on this document, group to design a survey.

 

Note this group: Larry Strickling asked some specific questions to CWG, and one in particlur to this
group.

See::
<http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/2015/remarks-assistant-secretary-strickling-state-net-confe
rence-1272015>
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/2015/remarks-assistant-secretary-strickling-state-net-confer
ence-1272015

 

Jaap: notes difference made between test for transition and those related to accountability. Further
Siva list needs to be trimmed to proper risks.. Currently list is open ended.. 

 

Action Siva: Group /merge the tests/scenario's identified in similar way as WA 4 CCWG list. Need to
check if relevant for transition.

Question: what does it mean if a test fails? What are the metrics if doing the test/benchmark?

No clear answer. This is testing organization. 

Suggestion: check what is meant with testing. Is checking impact on 

 

Action Staff: RFP 4 wants to have a meeting with staff/and or NTIA around meaning of tests

 

Going forward

No further comments on Larry Strickling statement

Greg: Check what are causes ans outcomes. tests should be focused on IANA specific risks. 

OCL: Board Risk Framework Committee,(BRC) is working on list of contingencies. This list is most
likely not publicly available.  Assumption the list of scenario's is on list.

Action staff : try to arrange meeting with BRC to seek information from them on  risks already
identified, and possibly relevant for RFP 4 group

 

Update Timeline, transition time line 

OCL: Time line was geared against one proposal , however it this is now changing given RFP 3b now
will look at two alternatives.

 

Update RFP 3b AM

RFP 3b contributes to document of CWG in preparation Singapore. The internal Option, will include
two variants

"Trust" option

"Bylaw option"

 

RFP 3 update: moving forward on fleshing out Contract Co option. Latest focus on structural details
and functions

As structural details are build out, more details could be included in set risks

 

 3. improvements to working methods

Looking for better coordination with other groups within CWG and with WA 4 of CCWG.

Need to avoid silo-ed work.

Question: what is best way to evolve work of this group, in conjunction with evolution of the
different models. 

How could coordination and collaboration with others could be improve

*       GS: Iterative process between RFP 3 and RFP 4. Would  be helpful for RFP 3 to review work of
RFP 4 to inform their work: apply stress test while models are developed. 

*       Vice versa also applies.  Update stress test, when tests are applied to models. 

*       Actively compare risk scenario's developed by different groups: BRC, CCWG, CWG and others

*       RG: To assist Feed-back of this group to RFP 3, what are changes going forward.

*       OCL:  Raises concern that RFP 3b has reached standstill until Singapore awaiting Legal
consideration. Risk of moving forward by this, without a linkage. 

*       GS: notes legal advice is limited,  should not be preclude to work in parallel on developing
tests. 

*       Try to work in parallel, and improve coordination to avoid wasting efforts. 

 

 4. Planning for ICANN Singapore meeting

*	Possible meetings with others. Suggestion to be send to list
*	Action all: request if participants see a need to meet, if so , then use Doodle poll to set
time.
*	Question: is there need for meeting before Singapore by this group? Response need on the
list by Friday 30 January 2015. 16.00 UTC.

 5. Other items

No comments

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150128/d4757726/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150128/d4757726/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150128/d4757726/smime-0001.p7s>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list