[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - CWG-Stewardship Proposal v2
Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk
Thu Jun 4 08:01:47 UTC 2015
Your comment on page 35: yes, like you I saw the CSC (as the name implies) specifically focussing on customer issues. The proposal brings in liaisons, but does this make it multi-stakeholder? I am concerned that we significantly amend the role of the CSC because it is seen as multi-stakeholder and other issues are of more interest to other stakeholders.
There are clear roles for the wider stakeholder liaisons - which is why they are liaisons - which are about improving communications and information about the discussions in the CSC with their own community.
So I would favour the deletion of the term multi-stakeholder in this paragraph and your addition.
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lise Fuhr
Sent: 04 June 2015 00:38
To: 'Marika Konings'; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - CWG-Stewardship Proposal v2
I have some comments and proposed changes to section IV. Please see attached document.
Fra: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] På vegne af Marika Konings
Sendt: 3. juni 2015 16:32
Til: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Emne: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - CWG-Stewardship Proposal v2
Apologies, someone just pointed out I attached the wrong document. Please find attached version 2. You can ignore the document I sent you in the previous email, the work on the public comment review tool has not been completed yet.
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
Date: Wednesday 3 June 2015 16:08
To: "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>
Subject: For your review - CWG-Stewardship Proposal v2
Please find attached version 2 of the proposal for your review which includes amongst others:
* Jonathan's edits
* Paragraph 102 - CWG edits
* Paragraph 106 - Martin addition
* Paragraph 111- Martin addition
* Paragraph 150 - CWG edits
* Paragraph 226 (Annex F) - Martin addition
* Paragraph 233 table - Martin addition
* Updated Section VI
* Updates from DT F concerning root zone maintainer and root zone environment
* Suggested changes to address Andrew's comments in paragraph 96 and 107
* Updates to Annex F
* Updates to Annex J per DT M's feedback
Please note that there are still some outstanding items that we expect to update as soon as input is received, for example from DT C concerning the CSC Charter, paragraph 123 (note action item for Avri), outstanding issue in Annex J under discussion by DT M and C, DT A input concerning Annex H, but we already wanted to give you an opportunity to review these latests updates. Furthermore, we will continue working on proofreading and formatting of the document and annexes.
Please share any comments and/or edits you have with the mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CWG-Stewardship