[CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments

[Milton L Mueller]

I can't 
--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 5:02 PM
> To: avri at acm.org; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public
> comments
> 
> Good catch Avri and good question. Can anyone think of a  reason why the
> ICANN Board should not be able to request an SIFR?
> 
> Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:39 PM
> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public
> comments
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am part of DT-M and partly responsible for this.
> 
> But.  It has a cost, which I did mention on the DT-M list:
> 
> There is currently no mechanism defined for the Board to initiate a SIFR.
> 
> Should there be?
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 04-Jun-15 16:10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >
> > Here is DT-M's final proposed response to comment review tool item #
> > 246 regarding AFRALO's suggestion that the PTI Board be allowed to
> > initiate a SIFR directly:  *"DT M carefully considered the
> > recommendation to allow the PTI Board to initiate a Special IFR but
> > decided against that while at the same time noting that the PTI Board
> > could request that the ICANN Board consider doing so."*
> >
> >
> >
> > If there are any questions, please let me know.
> >
> >
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> >           "This message (including any attachments) is intended only
> >           for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> >           addressed, and may contain information that is non-public,
> >           proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from
> >           disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
> >           attorney work product. If you are not the intended
> >           recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> >           dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
> >           communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> >           this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete
> >           this message immediately."
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship