[CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Sat Jun 6 14:18:08 UTC 2015

Thanks Seun.  That is helpful clarification.  I would like to note though that under the DT-M recommendations the CSC is not able to initiate an IFR either but rather escalates the problem to the ccNSO and GNSO and the SOs can do that.


From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 5:43 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: DT-M (dt6 at icann.org); cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments

Hi Chuck,

I think we should qualify the statement of AFRALO accurately. While it was recommended that PTI board could make such request for an IFR, AFRALO did not suggest that PTI be the initiator but rather CSC.
The point therefore is that PTI board would not have any basis to recommend for an IFR if the CSC does not escalate such to it.

We should also note that AFRALO statement was made before the CWG determined a certain direction of the nature of PTI board.


sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
Here is DT-M’s final proposed response to comment review tool item # 246 regarding AFRALO’s suggestion that the PTI Board be allowed to initiate a SIFR directly:  “DT M carefully considered the recommendation to allow the PTI Board to initiate a Special IFR but decided against that while at the same time noting that the PTI Board could request that the ICANN Board consider doing so.”

If there are any questions, please let me know.

“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately.”

CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150606/67deee52/attachment.html>

More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list