[CWG-Stewardship] FW: Fate of .int

Lindeberg, Elise elise.lindeberg at Nkom.no
Sun Jun 7 21:40:46 UTC 2015

I agree with Avri - we have to leave the substantial discussion on .int for after transition 


-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] På vegne av Avri Doria
Sendt: 5. juni 2015 15:43
Til: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Emne: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: Fate of .int


It seems to me that this could be one of the considerations of the post transition consideration on the long term future .int.  The intersts of the .int registrants another, as well as whatever may come out of the GAC considerations.  I think it is is enough to indicate there will full consideration of all issues, we do not need to enumerate the origin of the various opinions we may or may not get.


On 05-Jun-15 08:30, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
> Forwarding on behalf of Richard Hill
> On 6/5/15, 7:43 AM, "Richard Hill" <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:
>> =================================
>> I see that the matter of .int continues to be discussed on this list.  
>> I refer to Milton's message at:
>>  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/2015-May/003391.html
>> As Milton correctly points out, .int is not used by governments, it 
>> is used by intergovernmental organizations. And the representatives 
>> in GAC are typically not the people who represent governments in, 
>> say, ILO or WHO.
>> As I've pointed out before on this list, there was a formal process 
>> to consult the interested parties, intergovernmental organizations, 
>> and the result was the unanimous approval of Recommendation ITU-T E.910.
>> I don't see any reason to posit that the requirements and desires of 
>> intergovernmental organizations have changed since the approval of 
>> E.910, so I don't understand why implementation, to the extent 
>> practicable, of E.910 should not be made part of the transition.
>> To be clear: I am formally asking this group to include in its 
>> transition proposal the requirement that E.910 be implemented to the 
>> extent practicable as part of the transition.
>> Best,
>> Richard
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org

More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list