[CWG-Stewardship] Transition ProposalHi, v.3 -- Edits due on Sunday at 23:59 UTC
avri at acm.org
Mon Jun 8 12:14:38 UTC 2015
On 08-Jun-15 05:14, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> I am not sure Greg is saying exactly that.
> I understand his proposal to be that the IFR's remain on the same schedule
I think he says neither what i thought nor what I think you are saying:
> The only exception would be if a SIFR resulting in SCWG and ultimately
> in a new IFO (replacing PTI). In this case, the new IFO should be
> subject to a PIFR two years after commencing operations.
(I assume he means a IFR)
In any case. while I think that resetting the timer to Time 0 after any
SCWG is the right thing to do, it is not all that important.
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
More information about the CWG-Stewardship