[CWG-Stewardship] Transition ProposalHi, v.3 -- Edits due on Sunday at 23:59 UTC

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Mon Jun 8 12:14:38 UTC 2015




On 08-Jun-15 05:14, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> I am not sure Greg is saying exactly that.
>
> I understand his proposal to be that the IFR's remain on the same schedule
> regardless.

I think he says neither what i thought nor what I think you are saying:

>
> The only exception would be if a SIFR resulting in SCWG and ultimately
> in a new IFO (replacing PTI).  In this case, the new IFO should be
> subject to a PIFR two years after commencing operations.
>
(I assume he means a IFR)

In any case.  while I think that resetting the timer to Time 0 after any
SCWG is the right thing to do, it is not all that important.

avri



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list