[CWG-Stewardship] Transition ProposalHi, v.3 -- Edits due on Sunday at 23:59 UTC
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Mon Jun 8 12:14:38 UTC 2015
On 08-Jun-15 05:14, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> I am not sure Greg is saying exactly that.
>
> I understand his proposal to be that the IFR's remain on the same schedule
> regardless.
I think he says neither what i thought nor what I think you are saying:
>
> The only exception would be if a SIFR resulting in SCWG and ultimately
> in a new IFO (replacing PTI). In this case, the new IFO should be
> subject to a PIFR two years after commencing operations.
>
(I assume he means a IFR)
In any case. while I think that resetting the timer to Time 0 after any
SCWG is the right thing to do, it is not all that important.
avri
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list