[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] FW: Important: Final Proposal for review until 23:59 UTC on 10 June
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Jun 11 00:14:24 UTC 2015
A few minutes late, but...
In paragraph 125, page 24 of V4, I can live with
the current wording about the optional Public
Comment but meaningful AC/SO consultation.
However, the wording change I requested to
clarify that the BOTH the ccNSO and GNSO approval is needed was not made.
...triggered by a supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils ...
should read
...triggered by a supermajority vote of BOTH of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils...
(Caps added to highlight the change in this
message. The "of" following "both" is probably not needed.)
Alan
At 09/06/2015 10:59 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>Forwarding again to Client Committee.
>
>From: Grace Abuhamad
><<mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org>grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
>Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 5:46 PM
>To: Brenda Brewer
><<mailto:brenda.brewer at icann.org>brenda.brewer at icann.org>,
>"<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship at icann.org"
><<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Important: Final
>Proposal for review until 23:59UTC on 10 June
>
>Dear all,
>
>During our meeting today, we had our 3rd and
>final reading of the Proposal. Changes were made
>live, and outstanding changes were noted as
>action items (see notes below). The staff team
>has reviewed the proposal and completed all
>actions listed. Please note that Sidley will
>provide a final review as well which includes
>some work on the implementation text in Section
>IV and the Term Sheet in Annex S.
>
>With this, the CWG-Stewardship now enters into a
>final review period that lasts until 23:59 UTC
>tomorrow (10 June). As noted on the call, the
>intention of the review period is to do a
>proofread and notify the group of any errors.
>During this period of 26 hours, any statements
>or comments on the Proposal may also be sent to
>the group. As the Chairs noted on the call, if
>you are making a statement, please be sure to
>identify whether you do so as a member on behalf
>of a Chartering Organization, as an individual
>representing a specific organization, or as an
>individual with a personal remark/contribution.
>
>After 23:59 UTC on 10 June, the Chairs will work
>with staff to rectify any errors, update section
>VI.C. regarding statements, and deliver the
>Proposal to the Chartering Organizations on 11
>June. Our call on 11 June will focus on how the
>CWG-Stewardship does its engagement, through its
>members and participants, to coalesce support
>for the Proposal among Chartering Organizations.
>In addition, there are two webinars on 11 June
>(one at 06:00 UTC and one at 13:00 UTC):
><https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-06-03-en>https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-06-03-en.
>These webinars aim to provide a briefing to the
>broader community about the contents of the
>final proposal. Finally, as we head into ICANN53
>in Buenos Aires, please refer to the schedule of
>sessions that relate to the CWG-Stewardship
>work:
><https://community.icann.org/x/EJg0Aw>https://community.icann.org/x/EJg0Aw.
>
>Thank you all for your great work and dedication
>to the process. Please contact us if you have
>any questions regarding the process or administration over the next 48h.
>
>Best,
>Gramika (Grace+Marika)
>
>
>From: Brenda Brewer <<mailto:brenda.brewer at icann.org>brenda.brewer at icann.org>
>Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 4:01 PM
>To:
>"<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship at icann.org"
><<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings,
>Transcript CWG IANA #58 9 June 2015
>
>[]
>
>Dear all,
>
>The notes, recordings and transcripts for the
>CWG IANA Meeting # 58 on 9 June 2015 are
>available here:
><https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778032>https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778032
>
>Kind regards,
>Brenda
>
>
>
>
>Action Items
>
>
>
>
>
>Paragraph 108: Action: In document text, remove --> "as it is customary"
>
>Paragraph 134: Action: conform text to the
>defined terms used in the rest of the Proposal, among other things
>
>Paragraph 155: Action: remove capitals in "standing committee"
>
>Section IV: Action: Sidley to provide text on PTI implementation.
>
>Annex H: Action: remove escalation paragraph and preamble
>
>Annex J: Action: edits to #3 should be cross-checked with CSC Charter
>
>Action: conform text to the defined terms used
>in the rest of the Proposal, among other things
>
>
>
>Notes
>
>
>
>
>
>1. Opening Remarks
>· A big thanks to all who contributed to edits.
>· Following closure of this meeting,
>staff will send final document to the CWG.
>· CWG will then have 24h to notify the
>group of any errors. Intention is not to reopen
>issues, but to focus on proofing --> DUE AT 23:59 UTC on 10 JUNE
>· Chairs will transmit to SO/ACs on 11 June with covering note.
>
>2. Finalizing the Review Tool & Responses
>
>Can expect a final version to be circulated in
>the next 24h. Staff is working on
>consistency-checking across the responses. The
>document is frozen as of 1 June.
>
>3. Update on questions to ICANN Finance & Legal
>
>The letter and responses from ICANN are posted
>on Wiki:
><https://community.icann.org/x/7Jk0Aw>https://community.icann.org/x/7Jk0Aw.
>
>Staff have included the responses in Section IV
>(and included an Annex to for the Finance information).
>
>4. Last Review of Final Proposal
>
>On screen now is version 5. The difference
>between the previous version and the latest is
>that the Chairs took some time to review which
>items were still open and which had been
>resolved. Tried to focus CWG on the key
>outstanding issues. This latest version also
>includes the DT-A annex which has now been included.
>
>Paragraph 108: Change the wording from
>"ringfence" to "isolate" and remove the
>definition in the footnote. ICANN has control
>and ownership of PTI and the implementation
>documents will assure against further transfer out of assets.
>
>Action: In document text, remove --> "as it is customary"
>
>Paragraph 121/ Footnote 11: footnote is satisfactory.
>
>Paragraph 125: make clear "supermajority from
>both" ccNSO and GNSO. Also including the CSC as part of the remit.
>
>Paragraph 128: covered by resolution in paragraph 121
>
>Paragraph 134: SLEs discussion -- principles are
>included in annex and summary is included in the section now.
>
>Action: conform text to the defined terms used
>in the rest of the Proposal, among other things
>
>Paragraph 155: Action: remove capitals in "standing committee"
>
>Section IV: Action: Sidley to provide text on PTI implementation.
>
>Annex G: edit to the Remedial Action Procedures table
>
>Annex H: Action: remove escalation paragraph and preamble
>
>Annex J: Action: edits to #3 should be cross-checked with CSC Charter
>
>Term Sheet: staff to revise with comments from Sidley and Greg
>
>5. Overall Timeline / Milestones
>
> a. Communications
>
> b. Webinars on 11 June
>
> c. Sessions at ICANN 53
>
>6. AOB
>
> a. Thursday 11 June -- 1 hour call about CWG engagement
>
> b. Canceling Tuesday 16 June call
>
> c. Client Committee on Friday 12 June
>
>7. Closing Remarks
>
>After proposal is sent, 24h to respond with
>comments or statements DUE AT 23:59 UTC on 10 JUNE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cwg-client mailing list
>Cwg-client at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150610/c368f4a2/attachment.html>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list