[CWG-Stewardship] Feedback on First Webinar

[Jordan Carter]

Dear all,dear Olivier

I would like to just add my voice on the first point - it is my assumption
that these webinars are aimed mainly at people who are coming new to the
material and who will be looking to understand what they will approve - or
not approve - in BA.

If that assumption is right, I do urge that the format be changed so that
the focus is on the substance of the proposal. Taking time on the process
does not seem to be the right focus at this stage, for the audience.

bests,
Jordan


On 11 June 2015 at 19:42, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> First, thanks to Lise for taking us through the slide deck and making a
> complex proposal a lot more understandable.
> Now for my comments:
>
> - We have spent again around 30 minutes on the process reaching this
> point and a much smaller time on the contents of the proposal itself. I
> think that by this stage we should have a lot more detail in the actual
> explanation of the contents of the proposal, describing CSC, IFR, the
> PTI Board, SCWG, the escalation process (there is no slide showing all
> of the various levels of escalation and remedials) from the time a
> complaint starts and the various levels at which the complaint can be
> addressed. IMHO *this* should be the meat of the presentation.
> - Questions like "what happens to PTI if another IANA Functions Operator
> is selected after separation?" are bound to come up recurrently and we
> completely forgot to mention that this is just the Names and the
> Protocols & Numbers will likely remain with PTI through their contract
> with ICANN. This is not made clear at all that an IFR is only to do with
> Names.
> - We did not emphasize the technical nature of the whole ecosystem and
> it therefore feels like a lot of these processes are political - and
> this is not inspiring confidence. Emphasis on Service Level
> Expectations; emphasis on Operational Continuity; emphasis on Stability
> of the DNS. How are all of the processes and groups proposed
> contributing to this emphasis?
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>



-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150611/0f2097e6/attachment.html>