[CWG-Stewardship] CONGRATS! Proposal Submitted to Chartering Orgs!
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 19:13:23 UTC 2015
Thanks a lot for this update...weldone to staff and every
member/participants of this WG. I guess its not over until its over. Can't
wait for us to be done with this transition ;-)
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
> Dear all,
> Below is the message sent to Chartering Organizations to submit the
> proposal. For the CWG, I’ve attached the redline version as well, so that
> you can track all the changes made.
> Congratulations to all!
> From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 10:53 AM
> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>, Byron Holland <
> byron.holland at cira.ca>, "Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch" <
> Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>, Jonathan Robinson <
> jrobinson at afilias.info>, Patrik Fältström <paf at netnod.se>
> Cc: Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr at difo.dk>, Theresa Swinehart <
> theresa.swinehart at icann.org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel at icann.org>,
> Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, Bernard Turcotte <
> turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
> Subject: CWG-Stewardship Response for Chartering Organization
> Consideration and Approval
> *Sent on behalf of CWG-Stewardship Chairs by support staff. *
> To: CWG-Stewardship Chartering SOs and ACs
> The ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO, and SSAC
> Dear SO and AC Chairs,
> *CWG-Stewardship proposed response to the ICG RFP the IANA Stewardship
> The Cross Community Working Group on Naming Related Functions
> (CWG-Stewardship) is pleased to provide its Chartering Organizations with
> its proposed response to the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group
> (ICG) Request for Proposals on the IANA Stewardship Transition for your
> consideration and approval as per its Charter.
> The response is the result of extensive work by the CWG’s 19 members, 133
> participants and a team of highly qualified legal advisors over the past
> year, which included over 100 calls or meetings, 2 public consultations and
> more than 4,000 email messages. It represents a carefully crafted balance
> between key requirements, specific legal advice, and significant
> compromises by all who participated and includes diligent attention to the
> input received through the Public Comment proceedings. The final proposal
> has received the consensus support of the CWG-Stewardship with no
> objections or minority statements recorded for Chartering Organization
> As noted in the CWG-Stewardship proposal itself, the proposal is
> significantly dependent and expressly conditioned on the implementation of
> ICANN-level accountability mechanisms proposed by the Cross Community
> Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability). The
> co-chairs of the CWG-Stewardship and the CCWG-Accountability have
> coordinated their efforts and the CWG-Stewardship is confident that the
> CCWG-Accountability recommendations, if implemented as expected, will meet
> the requirements that the CWG-Stewardship has previously communicated to
> the CCWG. If any element of these ICANN level accountability mechanisms is
> not implemented as contemplated by the CWG-Stewardship proposal, this
> proposal will require revision.
> We also note that there are certain implementation elements that will
> require further dialogue in the near future, including with the other
> operational communities, and these have been marked as such in the final
> proposal. Two specific issues are particularly important to highlight. One
> is the finalization of the service level expectations (SLEs), where the
> proposal includes a set of agreed principles between the CWG and IANA, but
> these remain to be finalized in the form of a mutually agreed set of SLEs.
> A detailed plan for this finalisation is being worked on and it is our view
> that this detail, whilst vitally important, does not impact on the
> substance of the proposal put to you for approval. The second issue entails
> the location of intellectual property rights and this needs further
> discussion with the other respondents to the ICG RFP and ICANN.
> As per the CWG-Stewardship’s Charter we now seek your approval to submit
> this final proposal to the ICG and ask you to consider this approval in
> accordance with your respective SO or AC rules and procedures by 25 June
> 2015 to meet the overall timing requirements which would allow the
> transition to proceed, noting that final approval is conditional on the
> approval of the CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 1 recommendations.
> We will make ourselves, together with or other key contributors, available
> to you at the ICANN 53 meeting in Buenos Aires in order to answer any
> questions you may have and to explain any details of the proposal. For your
> information, further background documents as well as the slides, recordings
> and transcripts of recent webinars explain the details of the final
> proposal are available here: https://community.icann.org/x/sJc0Aw.
> Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
> Lise Fuhr & Jonathan Robinson
> *Co-Chairs, CWG-Stewardship*
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CWG-Stewardship