[CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft

[Martin Boyle]

Sorry, I meant ICANN consensus.  I still think it is something for us to define for the different mechanisms we put in place.

From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
Sent: 05 March 2015 11:00
To: Martin Boyle; avri at acm.org; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft



Thanks Avri,

I'm not sure I really understand what ICANN accountability would mean in this footnote.  Surely the important thing would be to define the rules for the various structures we put in place to avoid unintended consequences


FWIW, Martin, she proposed "ICANN consensus" not "ICANN accountability." ICANN consensus simply makes it a more well-defined term

Milton L Mueller
Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
Syracuse University School of Information Studies
http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
Internet Governance Project
http://internetgovernance.org<http://internetgovernance.org/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150305/e9bb6af8/attachment.html>