[CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

[Duchesneau, Stephanie]

Hi Jonathan,

I would like to be participate on Design Team B. My SOI can be found below.

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Stephanie+Duchesneau+SOI

Thank you.

Stephanie

Stephanie Duchesneau
Neustar, Inc. / Public Policy Manager
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2623 Mobile: +1.703.731.2040  Fax: +1.202.533.2623 / www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
________________________________
The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:44 AM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

All,

As an additional clarification, please note that DT-A, B and C have now been approved by the co-chairs, with a slight modification to the scope of DT-C, i.e. the removal of consideration of the authorization function since a separate DT will be dealing with that issue.

As such, the co-chairs would welcome expressions of interest as soon as possible for members of DT-B and DT-C taking into account the membership structure:

For Design Team B:

  *   two or three ccTLD representatives
  *   one or two GAC representatives.
For Design Team C:

  *   At a minimum two gTLD registry representatives with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
  *   At a minimum two ccTLD registry representatives with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
  *   One IANA staff member (current or former)
  *   One non-direct customer representative with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
  *   One liaison from NTIA to verify NTIA's current responsibilities
As noted previously, members of design teams are expected to make the necessary time available to complete the tasks of the design team as well as having the necessary skills and expertise as identified in the proposed membership structure. Those interest to volunteer for a DT are expected to share their expression of interest with the CWG mailing list which is expected to include their Statement of Interest (SOI) or provide a link to the existing SOI as well as their qualification for the DT.

The co-chairs in consultation with the DT lead, will review the volunteers that have come forward and determine the membership of the DT, ensuring sufficient expertise and a balanced membership.

Thanks,


Jonathan

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info]
Sent: 09 March 2015 21:50
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs


All,



Please see attached for a status update on the Design Teams in preparation for our call tomorrow.



Lise and I have reviewed the whole DT landscape and the current status is reflected in the document.



Please note that it contains the following:



*         A status for each DT per the model of the step-by-step process which has been referenced in Annex A.

*         A note section as part of the index to provide additional comments as needed

*         New prospective DTs added

o   L (IANA Function Separation Mechanism),

o   M (Escalation mechanisms beyond CSC) and

o   N (Periodic Review of IANA Functions).

*         An updated description for .INT DT to match description in draft transition proposal.

*         An 'expression of interest field', currently only in the Authorization Function DT-D
(as other expression of interests come in, we'll create the same for other DTs).



Where a priority is set as final, that is the priority we have agreed. Where it is provisional, that is indicative pending further detail on the DT emerging.



I look forward to reviewing this with you on the tomorrow.



Thanks,



Jonathan






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150310/52007f79/attachment-0001.html>