[CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

Tue Mar 10 20:15:46 UTC 2015

I would also like to volunteer for design team C on the CSC.

My SOI is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Sarah+Falvey+SOI

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Duchesneau, Stephanie <
Stephanie.Duchesneau at neustar.us> wrote:

>  My apologies. Had meant to refer to design team C, on the CSC. Mind is
> spinning a bit between working groups/parties/streams, design teams etc.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Stephanie
>
> *Stephanie Duchesneau*
> *Neustar, Inc. / *Public Policy Manager
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20006
> *Office:* +1.202.533.2623 *Mobile: *+1.703.731.2040  *Fax: *
> +1.202.533.2623 */* www.neustar.biz
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this email message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this email message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Duchesneau, Stephanie
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 12:38 PM
> *To:* 'jrobinson at afilias.info'; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview
> for the CWG DTs
>
>
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>
> I would like to be participate on Design Team B. My SOI can be found below.
>
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Stephanie+Duchesneau+SOI
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsosoi_Stephanie-26-2343-3BDuchesneau-26-2343-3BSOI&d=AwMFAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=0hsxJJjdrXRgjayVdcz_CARI78PKqWTRtnf4a8uMAWU&m=hzzBmxpQaKYkKRXT2537hLF1N71eFAOB2H-mglE0EuE&s=aZzbfPdYTtCk9dRiD0AchL24iRPYIVG3p-e-fwH53Yo&e=>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Stephanie
>
>
>
> *Stephanie Duchesneau*
> *Neustar, Inc. / *Public Policy Manager
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20006
> *Office:* +1.202.533.2623 *Mobile: *+1.703.731.2040  *Fax: *
> +1.202.533.2623 */* www.neustar.biz
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this email message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this email message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:44 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview
> for the CWG DTs
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> As an additional clarification, please note that DT-A, B and C have now
> been approved by the co-chairs, with a slight modification to the scope of
> DT-C, i.e. the removal of consideration of the authorization function since
> a separate DT will be dealing with that issue.
>
>
>
> As such, the co-chairs would welcome expressions of interest as soon as
> possible for members of DT-B and DT-C taking into account the membership
> structure:
>
>
>
> For Design Team B:
>
>    - two or three ccTLD representatives
>    - one or two GAC representatives.
>
> For Design Team C:
>
>    - At a minimum two gTLD registry representatives with operational
>    knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
>    - At a minimum two ccTLD registry representatives with operational
>    knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
>    - One IANA staff member (current or former)
>    - One non-direct customer representative with operational knowledge of
>    IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
>    - One liaison from NTIA to verify NTIA’s current responsibilities
>
> As noted previously, members of design teams are expected to make the
> necessary time available to complete the tasks of the design team as well
> as having the necessary skills and expertise as identified in the proposed
> membership structure. Those interest to volunteer for a DT are expected to
> share their expression of interest with the CWG mailing list which is
> expected to include their Statement of Interest (SOI) or provide a link to
> the existing SOI as well as their qualification for the DT.
>
>
>
> The co-chairs in consultation with the DT lead, will review the volunteers
> that have come forward and determine the membership of the DT, ensuring
> sufficient expertise and a balanced membership.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info
> <jrobinson at afilias.info>]
> *Sent:* 09 March 2015 21:50
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> Please see attached for a status update on the Design Teams in preparation
> for our call tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Lise and I have reviewed the whole DT landscape and the current status is
> reflected in the document.
>
>
>
> Please note that it contains the following:
>
>
>
> ·         A status for each DT per the model of the step-by-step process
> which has been *referenced in Annex A*.
>
> ·         A note section as part of the index to provide additional
> comments as needed
>
> ·         New prospective DTs added
>
> o   L (IANA Function Separation Mechanism),
>
> o   M (Escalation mechanisms beyond CSC) and
>
> o   N (Periodic Review of IANA Functions).
>
> ·         An updated description for .INT DT to match description in
> draft transition proposal.
>
> ·         An ‘expression of interest field’, currently only in the
> Authorization Function DT-D
> (as other expression of interests come in, we’ll create the same for other
> DTs).
>
>
>
> Where a priority is set as final, that is the priority we have agreed.
> Where it is provisional, that is indicative pending further detail on the
> DT emerging.
>
>
>
> I look forward to reviewing this with you on the tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>

-- 
Sarah Falvey | Policy Manager | sarahfalvey at google.com | 202-346-1230
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150310/63ea742e/attachment-0001.html>