[CWG-Stewardship] Principles: revised draft 11 March

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

On 11-Mar-15 15:58, Martin Boyle wrote:
> 5.iv footnote:  We had comments about the meaning of consensus in the
> footnote.  I do not think that defining consensus is in the remit of
> this document, but is part of the considerations of any entity that we
> establish.  Hence I have added, “Conditions for consensus will need to
> be agreed appropriate for the group” to make this clear.  In response
> to Christopher Wilkinson, I have amended the footnote to read “one or
> more members”. 

as this was my issue, just wanted to say I am comfortable with the change.

Thanks

avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150311/9f3bcb8b/attachment.html>