[CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi,

Well even if it's yes (which is also my personal opinion), I don't think
ICANN as a stakeholder just like every other stakeholder within CWG should
be given posting rights on the client list.
I will assume ICANN board chair for instance recognises this hence his
reason for subscribing as an observer.

On a lighter note, all these are minor issues to me and I will say could be
a little distracting. Getting response from the legal firm is the most
important now!

Cheers!
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 13 Mar 2015 20:44, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 13-Mar-15 15:34, David Conrad wrote:
>
>
>  Is ICANN staff a stakeholder in the transition or not?
>
>
> that seems to be a point of dispute.
>
> Some like me believe/argue yes.
> Many others believe/argue no.
>
> Definitely not something we have consensus on.
>
> avri
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>    <http://www.avast.com/>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150313/6630cc3e/attachment.html>