[CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee

[CW Lists]

That's Okay, provided that other NTIA contractors are also excluded.

CW


On 15 Mar 2015, at 21:10, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  
>  
> As a result, some ICANN people have posting rights; maybe that will be changed.
>  
> MM: Hi, Greg. You noted that there were legitimate reasons why they had posting rights originally, but you also noted that those reasons no longer exist. So I see no reason why it should not be changed. Just put them in the same status (observer) as the rest of us.
>  
> I'm not saying the names will stay, but the deep symbolism and concern that has been attached to the names being on the list is without merit, and spending time discussing it is just a distraction from the real work we all have to do.
>  
> MM: Agreed, so let’s just fix it.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150315/c9543706/attachment.html>