[CWG-Stewardship] DT-F Lead Needed

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi,

If there is the understanding of the 2 points below:
- That there is supposed to be another process that handles the
relationship between NTIA & the root zone maintainer (which is not within
the scope of CWG)
- That the relationship between NTIA & IANA is what the CWG is supposed to
look into transitioning (which is what most DTs is expected to address)

Then I don't think there would be need for DT-F

I hope we are not fragmenting these DTs beyond defragmentation.

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 16 Mar 2015 17:20, "Grace Abuhamad" <grace.abuhamad at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> On our last call, on Thursday, we noted an action to make a call for a
> DT-F lead. This DT is listed as a Priority 1 DT, so we would like to
> identify a lead and a working group as soon as possible.
>
> As a reminder, here is an excerpt about DT-F from the Status document on
> the Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Design+Teams+List
>
>
>
> Design Team F
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Design+Teams+List#F>
>
> Relationship between the NTIA, IANA and the Root Zone Maintainer
>
> Lead
>
> TBC
>
> Status
>
> Step 0, Priority 1 (Provisional)
>
> Note
>
>
>
> Best,
> Grace
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150316/dbc22051/attachment.html>