[CWG-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda for 3/17 call

[Seun Ojedeji]

Thanks for the share Grace, item no 5 of the agenda gives me serious
concern; if we cannot take advantage of our face 2 face and ensure high
intensity discussion to produce highly productive outcome. I personally
doubt the remote based meeting will achieve more, especially considering
most will just be settling down from the face 2 face. Unless we want to
produce an outcome that is largely evident of views motivated beyond
voluntary. I hope the Co-chairs will take this seriously.

I am raising this just incase I am unable to join in tomorrow's call as I
like it to be on record.

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 16 Mar 2015 17:43, "Grace Abuhamad" <grace.abuhamad at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please see below the proposed agenda for the call on 17 March at 17:00
> UTC.
>
> *Proposed Agenda 17/3*:
> 1. Opening Remarks
> 2. Proposal 2.2
> 3. Design Teams
>      a. Istanbul cut-off on Monday 18:00 UTC
>      b. Update on DT-A (Paul Kane)
>      c. Update on DT-B (Allan MacGillivray)
>      d. Update on DT-C (Donna Austin)
>      e. Status of additional DTs (DT-D; DT-F; DT-L; DT-M; Red team; DT-N)
> 4. Update from Client Committee
> 5. AOB
>      a. High Intensity 1-2 April
> 6. Closing Remarks
>
> *Outstanding Actions*:
> Action (Robert & Cheryl): suggest text to fill out sections 4 and 5 of
> proposal (Wiki will serve as basis)
> Action (Avri): Review the work of the CWG and the communications between
> CCWG/CWG to ensure that the interdependencies are up to date
> are they outdated?)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150316/cfc56bee/attachment.html>