[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA F2F Day 2 Session 8 | 27 March

Sun Mar 29 09:47:51 UTC 2015

Yeah I finally figured that out after briefly going through the discussions
log.

Thanks for providing the clarification Chuck.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 28 Mar 2015 21:40, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

>  Seun,
>
>
>
> It is my understanding that we have asked Sidley to look both the internal
> accountability and the hybrid subsidiary models.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Seun Ojedeji
> *Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2015 4:08 PM
> *To:* Brenda Brewer
> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA
> F2F Day 2 Session 8 | 27 March
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Briefly reading through this, It seem "internal accountability" is no
> longer considered but the "integrated/hybrid" is? (I guess I will have to
> go through the transcript for the sessions I missed) In anycase I think it
> was the best meeting of the CWG ever.
>
> Thanks to staff for all the effort and to Brenda/Grace especially for the
> remote support. I also like to specially commend the Co-Chairs for the
> level of coordination provided through the meeting to ensure focus that
> produced great outcome. Kudus to the entire CWG for the level of maturity
> exhibited as well.... at the end, whatever solution will come up with will
> be attributed to the entire community so it will be win win for us all as I
> expect we are all interested in the continued operation of IANA in a manner
> that maintains/improve overall stability of the DNS.
>
> On an unrelated note, my country Nigeria decides on it's next president
> tomorrow, do remember us in your prayers as we go through the process.
>
> Regards
>
> sent from Google nexus 4
> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>
> On 27 Mar 2015 16:49, "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer at icann.org> wrote:
>
>  Dear all,
>
>
>
> The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Face to Face Day 2
> Session 8 Meeting on 27 March are available here:  Session 8
> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52893304>
>
>
> Action Items
>
> ·        *Action (Lise): set a deadline for Principles*
>
> ·
> *Action (Sidley team): looking at the internal models (functional separation and legal separation) with focus on the entity which is the IANA functions. *
> *
> From there, look into what the implementation possibilities /requirements are. Focus on the diversity of the gTLD and ccTLD legacies.*
>
>
> ·        *Action: Cheryl and Alan to work this out*
>
> ·
> *Action (members): go back to their chartering org and explain the timeline and the short form/ long form proposal *
>
> ·
> *Action (staff): look at lessons learned for document management from PC in Policy and Implementation WG*
> Notes
>
> *Question to consider during the break*
>
> What are the fundamental issues that we are trying to solve for?
>
>
> Are we or can we converge around a solution? Is there something around which we can converge?
>
> Comments:
>
> ·
>
>    -
>    Suggest that external is put to the side for now, and that the integrated/hybrid model be brought forward
>    -
>    Look at this from perspective of stability and continuity is important and may lead to hybrid model
>    -
>    With hybrid, we are taking the bet on enhancing ICANN's accountability, and if we lose that bet, then it should be lost publically. Contract Co. is
>    hedging against that bet.
>    - Registries would like to explore the internal solutions further
>    -
>    A proposal that Sidley look into the Hybrid model and Contract Co. model
>    -
>    There are a lot of similarities in the internal models -- would like for Sidley to look at those
>    -
>    We got input on the Contract Co. model from our Public Comment in December 2014
>    - Would *not* communicate that we have eliminated Contract Co.
>    -
>    How do we fill in the gaps in the Hybrid model? Perhaps Sidley can assist with that
>    - Contract Co. may have ideas to contribute to Hybrid
>    -
>    Sidley can help us understand how we institutionalize the link with the CCWG-Acct work (Sidley is working with both groups)
>    - Consider the broader community (the GAC, the WSIS+10 review, etc)
>
>  *Chair's summary: *
>
> We don't want to pre-empt a decision, but we want a focus
>
> There are still details to iron out
>
> Sidley will focus on internal models
>
>
> We are working closely with CCWG-acct and are perhaps even giving them more direction for their work with our focus
>
> *Action* (Lise): set a deadline for Principles
>
> *Action*
>  (Sidley team): looking at the internal models (functional separation and legal separation) with focus on the entity which is the IANA functions. From there, look into what the implementation possibilities /requirements are. Focus on the diversity of the gTLD and ccTLD legacies.
>
>
> *Design Team Status Update*
>
> ·
>
> ·        DTA -- prefer before 10 April
>
> ·        DTB is in progress (survey ends on 3 April)
>
> ·        DTC has a lot of work to do before 10 April
>
> ·        DTD is changing its purpose to move the considerations to DTF
>
> *Action:* Cheryl and Alan to work this out
>
> ·
>
> ·        DTE is complete and will be submitted to Red team
>
> ·        DTF -- Alan is lead
>
> ·        DTL -- waiting on some requested documents
>
> ·        DTM may need to revisit considering CCWG output
>
> ·        DTN will take guidance and registries document for as input
>
> ·        DTO -- needs a lead
>
> ·        Red Team will be staff led
>
> Thank you DTs for all the good work
>
> *Timeline*
>
> Compiled by Berry Cobb
>
> Main changes:
>
> ·
>
>     - Public Comment is shifted back to 20 April
>          -
>          High intensity to prepare for public comment is moved to 13-14 April
>          - Translation is important
>          -
>          Public Comment may require special device with specific questions (part of the structured for discussed)
>          -
>          Structured PC makes the analysis more accurate and easier to do.
>          -
>          Risk factor of community concensus remains -- members must do their best to communicate back with their groups consistently so that there are no surprises
>
>  *Action*
>  (members): go back to their chartering org and explain the timeline and the short form/ long form proposal
>
> *Action*
>  (staff): look at lessons learned for document management from PC in Policy and Implementation WG
>
> *Key Dates*
>
> ·        10 April – deadline for DTs to provide content
>
> ·        13-14 Intensive working days – Preparing final proposal
>
> ·        20 Apr (Monday) – Start of Public Comment for 30 days
>
> ·        20 May (Wednesday) – Close of Public Comment
>
> -        - - Review public Comments / Continue Proposal Development - -
>
> ·        30 May (Saturday) – High-Intensity weekend
>
> ·        08 Jun (Monday) – Deliver Names Proposal to SOs/ACs
>
> ·        25 Jun (Thursday) - Deliver Names Proposal to ICG
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150329/c3a623b2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150329/c3a623b2/image001-0001.gif>