[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] Separation Review and Related Documents from Sidley

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Those edits have my support Chuck

On Fri, 29 May 2015 09:47 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

>  Avri,
>
>
>
> I identified two issues in this process that for which I inserted comments
> that are highlighted in yellow.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2015 12:53 PM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] Separation Review and
> Related Documents from Sidley
>
>
>
> Forwarding Sidley’s work on Separation Process.
>
>
>
> *From: *<Flanagan>, Sharon Flanagan <sflanagan at sidley.com>
> *Date: *Friday, May 22, 2015 at 5:47 PM
> *To: *Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[client com] Separation Review and Related Documents from
> Sidley
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Attached please find the following documents:
>
>
>
> 1.  Our comments to the Separation Process document.
>
>
>
> 2.  An updated document addressing CCWG dependencies to reflect the
> Separation Process.
>
>
>
> This document is an extract from the CCWG proposal and is marked to show
> proposed changes.   Consider whether you would want to communicate these
> new dependencies to CCWG through a comment letter to their proposal.
>
>
>
> 3.  A revised punch list document.
>
>
>
> Please note that this is not Staff-maintained punch list.  Instead it is
> the Sidley version where we added in the inputs we received from Greg from
> the design teams.   We also attach a redline so Staff can see what changes
> we are proposing and those changes can be carried over to the master punch
> list being maintained by Staff.  A few notes on the punch list:
>
>
>
>                 a.            We have identified new items arising out of
> the design team input (those are in yellow);
>
>
>
> b.            We have added the PTI item we discussed regarding input from
> ICANN finance/tax on the tax exempt status of PTI (#1A); and
>
>
>
>                 c.             We suggested specific wording changes to
> the CWG proposal to address the design team inputs on the punch list.
>
>
>
> Grace – could you please forward to CWG?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Holly, Sharon and Josh
>
>
>
> *SHARON* *FLANAGAN*
> Partner
>
> Sidley Austin LLP
> 555 California Street
> Suite 2000
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> +1.415.772.1271
> sflanagan at sidley.com
> www.sidley.com
>
> [image: http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]
> <http://www.sidley.com/> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>   _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150530/cec61712/attachment.html>