[CWG-Stewardship] Volume 11: An Update on IANA Stewardship Discussions

Tue Nov 3 15:16:05 UTC 2015

Hello all,

my immediate reaction is that if the ICG has given up the responsibility
of the oversight role in the implementations, this prompts each
operational community to perform this oversight and this translates to
CWG Stewardship having oversight of the implementation of our
recommendations.
Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 03/11/2015 14:46, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> In looking at what I think is the latest version of the Action Item
> Inventory, it looks like the ICG no longer is listed as the
> responsible party for implementation of any of the Names action items
> but I do note that in the oversight responsibility is shown as TBD for
> all of the Names action items.  At what point do we need to decide who
> has the oversight responsibility?
>
>  
>
> Chuck
>
>  
>
> *From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:26 AM
> *To:* Grace Abuhamad; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Volume 11: An Update on IANA
> Stewardship Discussions
>
>  
>
> Thanks Grace.  Based on the ICG decisions in Dublin, it appears that
> they will not be performing an oversight role of the implementation of
> the CWG Stewardship recommendations.  I think that means that we may
> need to update our implementation action item spreadsheet to remove
> the ICG as one of the responsible parties for certain action items.  I
> also think that the CWG may then be the responsible party in places
> where we listed the ICG.
>
>  
>
> Chuck
>
>  
>
> *From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:31 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Volume 11: An Update on IANA Stewardship
> Discussions
>
>  
>
> Original
> link:https://www.icann.org/news/blog/volume-11-an-update-on-iana-stewardship-discussions
>
>  
>
>
>   Volume 11: An Update on IANA Stewardship Discussions
>
>
>       Following ICANN54, the IANA Stewardship Transition is now a step
>       closer
>
> The ICG and CCWG-Accountability met in Dublin during ICANN54
> <https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54> to continue work on their
> proposals in wake of the feedback received during the two public
> comment periods that ended in September. The ICG was successful in
> completing its Consolidated IANA Stewardship Proposal and is now
> awaiting the finalization of the CCWG-Accountability’s Work Stream 1
> Recommendations. When CCWG-Accountability finalizes its Work Stream 1
> recommendations, and the CWG-Stewardship confirms that the
> recommendations meet its requirements, the ICGcan consider its
> proposal complete and begin the process of submitting it to the NTIA.
>
>
>       Consolidated IANA Stewardship Proposal
>
> Taking into account an analysis of the public comments
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/j07zo4malyc2sx6/Public%20Comment%20Summary%20-%2023Oct15-f2f%20edits-clean.docx?dl=0> received
> during the public comment period
> <https://www.ianacg.org/calls-for-input/combined-proposal-public-comment-period/> that
> ended on 8 September 2015, and after a number of working sessions
> <https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54/schedule-table?combine=ICG> duringICANN54
> <https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54> in Dublin,
> the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG
> <http://www.ianacg.org/>) has announced
> <https://www.ianacg.org/icg-completes-its-work-and-awaits-conclusion-of-ccwg-on-enhancing-icann-accountability/>that
> it has finalized its proposal
> <http://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/IANA-transition-proposal-v9.pdf>.
> However, before the ICG sends the proposal to the National
> Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA
> <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/>) via the ICANN Board, it will first confirm
> with the Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA Stewardship
> Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/CWG+to+Develop+an+IANA+Stewardship+Transition+Proposal+on+Naming+Related+Functions>)
> that its accountability requirements have been met by Work Stream 1
> recommendations currently being finalized by the Cross Community
> Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability
> <https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/CCWG+on+Enhancing+ICANN+Accountability>).TheICG has
> decided to keep its mailing lists active until 30 September 2016 to
> enable the community to continue to contact them, if needed. It is
> also seeking feedback from the threeIANA operational communities
> (names, numbers and protocol parameters) to see if they would
> like ICG to play a role during the implementation of
> the IANA Stewardship Transition. The ICGwill not hold any more
> face-to-face meetings and will only hold conference calls on an
> as-needed basis.
>
> There are still some implementation details to be finalized for the
> transition, including the issue of the IANA trademark and intellectual
> property rights (IPR). The CWG-Stewardship will work with the two
> other operational communities to find a solution to the IPR issue that
> meets the needs of all three communities.
>
>
>       CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 1 Recommendations
>
> Following the 12 September end of the public comment period
> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-2015-08-03-en> for
> the 2nd Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-draft-2-proposal-work-stream-1-recs-03aug15-en.pdf>,
> the CCWG-Accountability held a face-to-face meeting
> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-2015-08-03-en>,
> 25-26 September, in Los Angeles, and a number of working sessions
> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56134263> in
> Dublin during ICANN54. As a result of its work to incorporate the
> feedback from the community, including feedback from the ICANN Board,
> the CCWG-Accountability made a number of adjustments and refinements
> to its draft recommendations. As a result of the adjustments, the
> CCWG-Accountability has decided to send the revised recommendations
> for a third public comment period.
>
> The third comment period will have a two-stage approach so the
> community can begin reviewing the materials as soon as possible. This
> is to enable the report on Work Stream 1 recommendations to be
> finalized and sent to the ICANN Board by mid January 2016, ensuring
> there are minimal effects on the timeline of the IANA Stewardship
> Transition.
>
>
>       Key dates
>
> *15 Nov 2015*
>
> 	
>
> A high-level overview of Work Stream 1 Recommendations and a summary
> of changes from the 2nd Draft Proposal to be:
>
> 1.      Released for a 35-day public comment period
>
> 2.      Sent to the CCWG-Accountability’s Chartering Organizations for
> their feedback
>
> *30 Nov 2015*
>
> 	
>
> Full third draft report on Work Stream 1 Recommendations released for
> 20 days of consultation
>
> *Early Jan 2016*
>
> 	
>
> Amended report submitted to Chartering Organizations
>
> *Mid Jan 2016*
>
> 	
>
> Potential face-to-face meeting for Chartering Organizations, if
> needed, to decide whether to support the report
>
> *Mid Jan 2016*
>
> 	
>
> CCWG-Accountability to submit final report to the ICANN Board,
> enabling theICG to also submit its final report
>
> For more information on the amendments that the CCWG-Accountability
> decided to pursue in Dublin, see the Cross Community Working Group on
> Enhancing ICANN Accountability ICANN54 co-Chairs' Statement
> <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/Cross%20Community%20Working%20Group%20on%20Enhancing%20ICANN%20Accountability%20ICANN54%20co-Chairs%27%20Statement>.
>
>
>       IANA Stewardship Transition in the news
>
> 27 Oct 2015
>
> 	
>
> Governments v. ICANN: The Last Battle Before the IANA Transition
> <http://blogs.cfr.org/cyber/2015/10/27/governments-v-icann-the-last-battle-before-the-iana-transition/>,
> Council on Foreign Relations [EN]
>
> 23 Oct 2015
>
> 	
>
> ICANN and IANA: Making the right – not a rash – decision
> <https://www.aei.org/publication/icann-and-iana-making-the-right-not-a-rash-decision/>,
> American Enterprise Institute* *[EN]
>
> 13 Oct 2015
>
> 	
>
> Perché 40 mila ore di lavoro non sono bastate a trovare un accordo sul
> futuro di Internet senza la guida USA
> <http://www.chefuturo.it/2015/10/accordo-futuro-internet-usa/>,
> CheFuturo! [IT]
>
> 29 Sep 2015
>
> 	
>
> IANA-Aufgabe durch USA weiter unter Zeitdruck: Auf Messers Schneide
> <http://www.heise.de/netze/meldung/IANA-Aufgabe-durch-USA-weiter-unter-Zeitdruck-Auf-Messers-Schneide-2832298.html>,
> Heise [DE]
>
>
>       You can play a role in IANA’s future…
>
> /Anyone can participate in discussions about the future of IANA's
> stewardship and ICANNaccountability. For information on
> joining /*/CCWG-Accountability/*/,
> contact //accountability-staff at icann.org/
> <mailto:accountability-staff at icann.org>/./
>
> /Compiled on behalf of ICANN by Samantha Dickinson | 2 November 2015/
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20151103/7b522612/attachment-0001.html>