[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - draft responses to ICG Questions

[Alan Greenberg]

Milton,

Yes, in theory ICANN and Verisign could put anything in any document, 
but the proposal was explicitly addressing ONLY Paragraph 150, 
section 1 of the CWG report. That intent may not be clear in reading 
it, but that is the case. It is a far more complex implementation 
that envisioned by DT-F, but that does not alter the intent.

Alan

At 02/10/2015 10:55 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:


> > -----Original Message-----
> > I don't think that the ICANN-Verisign proposal could meet that requirement
> > because it is beyond their control.  They are both dependent on action by
> > NTIA.
>
>I do not understand what you are saying here, Chuck. NTIA asked 
>ICANN and Verisign for a proposal regarding post-transition RZM. 
>They could propose whatever they liked. Yes, they depend on action 
>by NTIA to implement it, but the ICG is asking whether the proposal 
>meets requirements.
>
>
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
> > bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:55 PM
> > To: Alan Greenberg; Marika Konings; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - draft responses to ICG
> > Questions
> >
> > As I have already pointed out to Alan and Chuck on the DT-F list, 
> I think the
> > ICANN-Verisign proposal for RZM does not meet one essential requirement of
> > the DTF.
> > We called for an agreement between the RZMaintainer and the IANA
> > Functions Operator to ensure that the IFO's changes would be implemented.
> > As far as I  can tell, that requirement is fudged in the 
> ICANN-Verisign proposal.
> > We have no idea what kind of an agreement, if any, would exist between
> > Verisign and ICANN after NTIA pulls away, nor do we have a more generic
> > notion of how ICANN, IFO and RZM relate.
> >
> > --MM
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
> > > bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 3:00 PM
> > > To: Marika Konings; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> > > Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - draft responses to
> > > ICG Questions
> > >
> > > Regarding the first item on the Verisign/ICANN proposal:
> > >
> > > To quote from an analysis I did for the ALAC Transition Support group:
> > >
> > > >The document is an implementation of the implied recommendation of
> > > >Design Team F that nothing be changed in the RZMS code prior to or
> > > >during transition. It follows the golden rule that you should make as
> > > >few changes at the same time as possible.
> > > >
> > > >In my mind, this proposal carried that rule to a ridiculous extreme.
> > >
> > > The proposal calls for an lot of work and expense to avoid making a
> > > relatively simple coding change that could be verified seventeen ways
> > > to Sunday. But yes, it does meeting the CWG requirements.
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> > > At 29/09/2015 09:57 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
> > > >Dear All,
> > > >
> > > >In order to facilitate the development of responses to the ICG
> > > >Questions, staff has, in co-ordination with the chairs, prepared the
> > > >attached table which provides a draft response for a number of the
> > > >ICG questions which is intended to serve as a starting point for
> > > >CWG-Stewardship deliberations. Please review this document and share
> > > >your feedback with the mailing list, if possible, prior to the
> > > >CWG-Stewardship meeting on Thursday.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >Marika
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > > >CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > > >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> > _______________________________________________
> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship