[CWG-Stewardship] SLE - Document - following the CWG call yesterday.

[Jonathan Robinson]

Thanks Keith,

I understand this better now. Let's discuss (in CWG) what may be possible.

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Davidson [mailto:keith at internetnz.net.nz] 
Sent: 10 September 2015 06:08
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] SLE - Document - following the CWG call
yesterday.

Thanks Paul for the updated version.

Unfortunately I will not be on the CWG call this week, but I am happy with
the amended SLE's.

On last weeks call, I was on a particularly bad connection, and asked a
question which I don't think our Chair fully understood, and his reply was
not particularly clear - so I would like to raise the question here for
discussion by others on the call - the question is:

"There were a number of ccTLDs who approved the Names Proposal at ICANN BA,
on the proviso that the SLE's will be included as part of the IANA
Transition Plan. With the likelihood the SLE's will be approved on this
call, how can the CWG be sure the SLE's will be accepted by the ICG as an
addition to the Transition Plan?"

My reason for the question is that the ICG cannot make this document
"materialise" into its documentation, so it requires some form of formal
submission to receive it. The CWG (or the SLE sub-group of CWG) could submit
the SLE document to the ICG as part of the "just closed" 
consultation round, as the ICG have stated they will still receive
submissions for another day or two. Or the CWG could refer the SLE document
to the ccNSO which could then discuss and vote on accepting, which would
likely be done at the Dublin meeting (which would be an unnecessary delay
imho).

I do hope this can be easily resolved on the call, and that somehow we can
formally submit the SLEs for inclusion by the ICG as early as possible.

Cheers

Keith


On 5/09/2015 3:49 a.m., Paul M Kane - CWG wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Thank you for the positive comments yesterday during our call 
> concerning the IANA Server Level Expectation document.
>
> As requested, I have updated the document to reflect the comments 
> raised (red-lined)..
>
> A clean version of this document (Rev1) I hope the CWG will formally 
> ratify next wee (on our 10th Sept call).
>
> I would also like to thank Bernie for taking us all through the 
> document and for checking the requested (Rev1) updates.
>
> Have a good w/end all
>
> Best
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship