[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA Bylaws Review Meeting | 11 April 2016

[Brenda Brewer]

Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Bylaws Review Meeting on 11 April will be
available here:  https://community.icann.org/x/RieAAw

 

A copy of the notes and action items may be found below.

 

Kind regards,

Brenda

 



Action Items

Action (Sharon): Reach out to Avri and Matt with Client Committee in copy about language in 18.4a.  

Action (Chairs): Due to time constraints on this call, Chairs will discuss and revert back to group
with next steps.

Notes

1. Review of CWG-Stewardship responses on Bylaws (lead by DT leads for each section)

*        Question 8: response approved with "direct customers"

*        Question 9: change to reflect confirmation of the question: CSC liaison is intended to come
from RrSG or NCSG. Only restriction is 
that this not be from a gTLD registry. 

*        Question 10: no change. 

*        Question 11: the "it may be appropriate" section can be placed in the Charter. It is not
for inclusion in Bylaws. 

*        Question 12: no change. 

*        Question 13: We can keep the clarification and refer to the original text as inclusive of
the broader community of 'consumers'. Or an 
alternative: direct customers of the naming services" (text used for CSC).  That text is as follows:
"Any necessary additions to the 
IANA SOW to account for the needs of the consumers of the IANA naming functions [and/or] the ICANN
community at large".  

*        Question 14: no change. 

*        Question 15: no change. 

*        Question 16: Suggest going back to original CWG proposal language ("reasonable consultation
with SOs and ACs")

*        Question 17: clarification on the definition of performance. 

*        Question 18: no change

*        Question 19: no change

*        Question 20: Suggestion for "as many individuals be appointed as possible". Agreement no to
specify any numbers. 

*        Question 21: no change

*        Question 22: no support for defining a simple majority. There is support for use of
consensus. The CWG-Stewardship 
proposal states that the SCWG would follow the stndards established by the CCWG-Principles. 

*        Question 24: no change

*        Other comments: Sharon has one question regaring 18.4a. Will reach out to Avri and Matt to
clarify. 

*        Paul Kane noted concerns with consistency in Bylaws language and focus on gTLDs. 

Action (Sharon): Reach out to Avri and Matt with Client Committee in copy about language in 18.4a.  

2. AOB

Next meeting (Thursday 14 April at 16:00 UTC). Group may not need a meeting on Thursday.  The
implementation update and other items 
may be able to be provided via email. 

Action (Chairs): Due to time constraints on this call, Chairs will discuss and revert back to group
with next steps. 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160411/5b040bb4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160411/5b040bb4/image003-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 378 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160411/5b040bb4/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160411/5b040bb4/smime-0001.p7s>