[CWG-Stewardship] [Iana-ipr] IANA IPR - Proposed resolution of selected legal issues

[Andrew Sullivan]

If there are protocol parameters, they go into the relevant registry
according to the registration rules (not all of them require an RFC).
But this set of IPR agreements has nothing to do with that, AFAICT.
It's just about who gets to call themselves "IANA" or use the iana.org
domain name.

A

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:08:41PM +0200, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
> Yes. I was referring to the protocol parameters.
> Apologies for not making that clear.
> 
> CW
> 
> 
> On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:58, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:29:49PM +0200, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
> >>> … a whole bunch of requests to register things.
> >> 
> >> But all the registrations will be based on RFCs. Correct?
> > 
> > I don't see why.  These are trademark registrations or domain name
> > registrations we're talking about.  AFAIK none of the previous such
> > registrations were done by RFC.  Publishing an RFC to get the Trust to
> > do something is a pretty heavyweight mechanism.
> > 
> > A (speaking for myself)
> > 
> > -- 
> > Andrew Sullivan
> > ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> 

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com