[CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: [client com] FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016

[Andrew Sullivan]

Hi,

Can you not send comments against the PDF?  It would be helpful to have comments soon. 

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan 
Please excuse my clumbsy thums. 

> On Aug 7, 2016, at 05:35, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Grec,
> Thank you very much for the amendments. I do not agree with some of them
> In order to enable me to provide my counter comments to you, pls provide a word version of your amendment as soon as convinient
> Regards
> Kavouss
> 
> 
> 2016-08-07 0:22 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>> CWG,
>> 
>> I am forwarding a revised draft of the proposed Community Agreement relating to the IANA IPR.  In addition to any other comments you may have, I draw your attention to the two specific items in the email below: (1) identifying an entity to sign for the names community, and (2) providing a brief description of the IANA Services used by the names community (see Exhibit A for descriptions provided by the other communities).
>> 
>> This will be the subject of further refinement by the IPR collaborative group early in the week, with the goal of initiating a public comment period as soon as possible after the CWG-IANA meeting on Thursday.
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>>  
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. <jhofheimer at sidley.com>
>> Date: Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:55 PM
>> Subject: [client com] FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016
>> To: Client <cwg-client at icann.org>
>> 
>> 
>> Dear Client Committee,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Attached please find a revised draft of the proposed Community Agreement for your review and comment.  This is an iterative version prepared jointly by counsel (Sidley) to the CWG and counsel to the IETF Trust to reflect the 7-point discussion items.  To be clear, it is still a work in progress, but we believe ready for the CWG to have an opportunity for review.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Two important issues to highlight:
>> 
>> 1) the Names Community needs to determine who will be the signatory party, acting on behalf of the Names Community, to the Community Agreement.  For your information, the attached draft has the organizations put forward to represent the Numbers and Protocols Communities; and
>> 
>> 2) we need a brief description of the IANA services to be provided on behalf of the Names Community.  The following high-level description was included in a draft of the Naming Functions Agreement.  If this is acceptable for including here is well, please advise (or we ask the Client Committee to provide a sufficient description):
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The “IANA Naming Function” is comprised of:
>> 
>> (a)             Management of the DNS Root Zone (“Root Zone Management”);
>> 
>> (b)             Management of the .INT top-level domain;
>> 
>> (c)              Maintenance of a repository of internationalized domain name tables and label generation rule sets; and
>> 
>> (d)             Provision of other services related to the management of .INT top-level domains, at ICANN’s reasonable request and at ICANN’s expense.
>> 
>> Please provide any comment or feedback as soon as practical, as we are trying to finalize the draft for approval by the various stakeholders and release for public comment by Thursday.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thank you in advance.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Josh
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Joshua Hofheimer
>> 
>> Sidley Austin LLP
>> 
>> jhofheimer at sidley.com
>> 
>> (213) 896-6061 (LA direct)
>> 
>> (650) 565-7561 (Palo Alto direct)
>> 
>> (323) 708-2405 (cell)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net] On Behalf Of Jorge Contreras
>> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:01 AM
>> To: iana-ipr at nro.net
>> Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> All – attached is a draft of the Community Agreement that Josh and I have collaborated on over the past two days.  We believe that it reflects the current requirements of the parties, and submit it for your review and discussion.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> A clean version, as well as a marked version against the draft of 07-30-16 (in PDF format) are attached.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Please note a few items that still need to be completed, including the description of the IANA Names Service, the identities of the CCG representatives, etc.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Jorge
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Jorge L. Contreras
>> 
>> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
>> 
>> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
>> 
>> Washington, DC 20036
>> 
>> contreraslegal at att.net
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
>> immediately.
>> 
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwg-client mailing list
>> Cwg-client at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160807/f523bbc5/attachment-0001.html>