[CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: [client com] FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016

Sun Aug 7 16:07:43 UTC 2016

Dear ALL

I HAVE no comments on the initial text before being changed
Regards
Kavouss

2016-08-07 18:04 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Seun
> NO
> PLS DO NOT MAKE MY JOB HARD..
> WHY NOT A RED MARK WORD VERSION
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2016-08-07 17:42 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Kavous,
>>
>> An option could be that you look at the PDF and make your comment on the
>> word version(though you can make comment on the pdf as well)
>>
>> Another option is if you (or someone) has the previous clean version then
>> one can produce a redline off the two clean versions.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sent from my LG G4
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>
>> On 7 Aug 2016 4:37 p.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Andrew,
>>> Tks again for your kind reply.
>>> Please send me a red mark  Word Version and I Will reply today.
>>> I HAVE SOME CONCERS ON SOME OF THE  CHANGED MADE  BY GREC
>>> Regards
>>> Kavouss
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-08-07 17:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>:
>>>
>>>> I don't know whetheer you will get that before tomorrow, and that is
>>>> really rather late.  Can you at least say what your concerns are?
>>>> There really isn't a lot of time: this needs to go to public comment
>>>> on Thursday.  An additional day to wait for the comments would be bad.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> A
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 05:14:50PM +0200, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>>> > Seun,
>>>> > I know that a word version was included but the Word Version is a
>>>> clean
>>>> > Text and it is difficult to identify the changes .I wish to see what
>>>> was
>>>> > the changes introduced by Greg
>>>> > I still need the red mark text in WORD VERSION.
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > Kavouss
>>>> >
>>>> > 2016-08-07 14:09 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:
>>>> >
>>>> > > A word version was included in Greg's mail
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Sent from my LG G4
>>>> > > Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On 7 Aug 2016 10:36 a.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <
>>>> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> Grec,
>>>> > >> Thank you very much for the amendments. I do not agree with some
>>>> of them
>>>> > >> In order to enable me to provide my counter comments to you, pls
>>>> provide
>>>> > >> a word version of your amendment as soon as convinient
>>>> > >> Regards
>>>> > >> Kavouss
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> 2016-08-07 0:22 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>> CWG,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> I am forwarding a revised draft of the proposed Community
>>>> Agreement
>>>> > >>> relating to the IANA IPR.  In addition to any other comments you
>>>> may have,
>>>> > >>> I draw your attention to the two specific items in the email
>>>> below: (1)
>>>> > >>> identifying an entity to sign for the names community, and (2)
>>>> providing a
>>>> > >>> brief description of the IANA Services used by the names
>>>> community (
>>>> > >>> *see* Exhibit A for descriptions provided by the other
>>>> communities).
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> This will be the subject of further refinement by the IPR
>>>> collaborative
>>>> > >>> group early in the week, with the goal of initiating a public
>>>> comment
>>>> > >>> period as soon as possible after the CWG-IANA meeting on Thursday.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Greg
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> > >>> From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. <jhofheimer at sidley.com>
>>>> > >>> Date: Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:55 PM
>>>> > >>> Subject: [client com] FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft:
>>>> 08-05-2016
>>>> > >>> To: Client <cwg-client at icann.org>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Dear Client Committee,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Attached please find a revised draft of the proposed Community
>>>> Agreement
>>>> > >>> for your review and comment.  This is an iterative version
>>>> prepared jointly
>>>> > >>> by counsel (Sidley) to the CWG and counsel to the IETF Trust to
>>>> reflect the
>>>> > >>> 7-point discussion items.  To be clear, it is still a work in
>>>> progress, but
>>>> > >>> we believe ready for the CWG to have an opportunity for review.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Two important issues to highlight:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> 1) the Names Community needs to determine who will be the
>>>> signatory
>>>> > >>> party, acting on behalf of the Names Community, to the Community
>>>> > >>> Agreement.  For your information, the attached draft has the
>>>> organizations
>>>> > >>> put forward to represent the Numbers and Protocols Communities;
>>>> and
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> 2) we need a brief description of the IANA services to be
>>>> provided on
>>>> > >>> behalf of the Names Community.  The following high-level
>>>> description was
>>>> > >>> included in a draft of the Naming Functions Agreement.  If this is
>>>> > >>> acceptable for including here is well, please advise (or we ask
>>>> the Client
>>>> > >>> Committee to provide a sufficient description):
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> The “*IANA Naming Function*” is comprised of:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> (a)             Management of the DNS Root Zone (“*Root Zone
>>>> Management*
>>>> > >>> ”);
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> (b)             Management of the .INT top-level domain;
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> (c)              Maintenance of a repository of internationalized
>>>> > >>> domain name tables and label generation rule sets; and
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> (d)             Provision of other services related to the
>>>> management
>>>> > >>> of .INT top-level domains, at ICANN’s reasonable request and at
>>>> ICANN’s
>>>> > >>> expense.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Please provide any comment or feedback as soon as practical, as
>>>> we are
>>>> > >>> trying to finalize the draft for approval by the various
>>>> stakeholders and
>>>> > >>> release for public comment by Thursday.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Thank you in advance.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Cheers,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Josh
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> *Joshua Hofheimer*
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> *Sidley Austin LLP*
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> *jhofheimer at sidley.com <jhofheimer at sidley.com>*
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> *(213) 896-6061 <%28213%29%20896-6061> (LA direct)*
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> *(650) 565-7561 <%28650%29%20565-7561> (Palo Alto direct)*
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> *(323) 708-2405 <%28323%29%20708-2405> (cell)*
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> *From:* iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net]
>>>> *On
>>>> > >>> Behalf Of *Jorge Contreras
>>>> > >>> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2016 10:01 AM
>>>> > >>> *To:* iana-ipr at nro.net
>>>> > >>> *Subject:* [Iana-ipr] Revised Community Agreement Draft:
>>>> 08-05-2016
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> All – attached is a draft of the Community Agreement that Josh
>>>> and I
>>>> > >>> have collaborated on over the past two days.  We believe that it
>>>> reflects
>>>> > >>> the current requirements of the parties, and submit it for your
>>>> review and
>>>> > >>> discussion.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> A clean version, as well as a marked version against the draft of
>>>> > >>> 07-30-16 (in PDF format) are attached.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Please note a few items that still need to be completed,
>>>> including the
>>>> > >>> description of the IANA Names Service, the identities of the CCG
>>>> > >>> representatives, etc.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Best regards,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Jorge
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Jorge L. Contreras
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Washington, DC 20036
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> contreraslegal at att.net
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and
>>>> > >>> confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
>>>> delete this
>>>> > >>> message immediately.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> ************************************************************
>>>> > >>> ****************************************
>>>> > >>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information
>>>> that is
>>>> > >>> privileged or confidential.
>>>> > >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail
>>>> and any
>>>> > >>> attachments and notify us
>>>> > >>> immediately.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> ************************************************************
>>>> > >>> ****************************************
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> > >>> Cwg-client mailing list
>>>> > >>> Cwg-client at icann.org
>>>> > >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> > >>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>>> > >>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>>> > >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>>> > >> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>>> > >> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>>> > >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>>
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>>> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew Sullivan
>>>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160807/16cda7f8/attachment-0001.html>