[CWG-Stewardship] "let the transition function" (was Re: [client com] CWG Comment Letter - PTI Bylaws)

[Andrew Sullivan]

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 07:01:47PM +0200, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:

> I suggest that it would be prudent to let the Transition function, as proposed and approved, for 12 to 18 months before going any further.

For the most part, I will take no position (which does not entail
disagreement, please note) on most of the positions in your mail, but
I don't actually understand the above sentence in relation to the
current thread.

In order to have the transition, PTI needs to be working and to be an
independent organization.  So it needs a board.  This was a
requirement of the ICG proposal.

In order to have the transition, the IPR needs to go to some
organization other than ICANN.  That was also a requirement of the ICG
proposal.

So what would it meant to "let the Transition function" without these
preconditions being met?

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com