[CWG-Stewardship] Joining Consensus

[Greg Shatan]

All,

Since the prior email ends up with the correct result (three times), I will
hold my comments on any of the statements (and even the accusations) made
in the process of getting to that result.

I'm sure my response will be well understood by the participants in the CWG
without my needing to state it even once.

I appreciate the opportunity to move on, as we still have much to do.

Best Regards,

Greg



On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Co Chairs,
>
> Dear CWG members and participants
>
> This the time that everybody come to the aid of the PART and demonstrate
> the utmost level of tolerance, flexibility and highest degree of
> collaboration  .
>
> The reactions shown by one person to my comments were unfair,
> inappropriate and outside the code of conduct .Perhaps its author was tired
> and exhausted
>
> Dear CWG members and participants
>
> There are structural and legal terms used in the draft which are
> incoherent and incompatible with each other. This has been subject to
> exchange of tens of mails among members.
>
> Having totally rejected the counter comments made by one participant, on
> the one hand, and having understood that except one person, everybody else
> agreed that the comments that I made are relevant and valid.
>
> Now, in reply to the comprehensive message and appeals made by various
> distinguish colleagues on mailing list and off list and having carefully
> considered the reasons given by our Chair Jonathan, and being always
> supportive of reaching compromise, in the interest of transition process, I
> joint the consensus emerged and have no objection to proceed with the
> approval of the draft
>
> I hope this will put on record that we need to understand each other
> problem and be collaborative to the maximum possible extent
>
> 2016-08-10 2:58 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear Co Chairs,
>>
>> Dear CWG members and participants
>>
>> This the time that everybody come to the aid of the PART and demonstrate
>> the utmost level of tolerance, flexibility and highest degree of
>> collaboration  .
>>
>> The reactions shown by one person to my comments were unfair,
>> inappropriate and outside the code of conduct .Perhaps its author was tired
>> and exhausted
>>
>> Dear CWG members and participants
>>
>> There are structural and legal terms used in the draft which are
>> incoherent and incompatible with each other. This has been subject to
>> exchange of tens of mails among members.
>>
>> Having totally rejected the counter comments made by one participant, on
>> the one hand, and having understood that except one person, everybody else
>> agreed that the comments that I made are relevant and valid.
>>
>> Now, in reply to the comprehensive message and appeals made by various
>> distinguish colleagues on mailing list and off list and having carefully
>> considered the reasons given by our Chair Jonathan, and being always
>> supportive of reaching compromise, in the interest of transition process, I
>> joint the consensus emerged and have no objection to proceed with the
>> approval of the draft
>>
>> I hope this will put on record that we need to understand each other
>> problem and be collaborative to the maximum possible extent
>>
>> 2016-08-10 2:57 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Dear Co Chairs,
>>>
>>> Dear CWG members and participants
>>>
>>> This the time that everybody come to the aid of the PART and demonstrate
>>> the utmost level of tolerance, flexibility and highest degree of
>>> collaboration  .
>>>
>>> The reactions shown by one person to my comments were unfair,
>>> inappropriate and outside the code of conduct .Perhaps its author was tired
>>> and exhausted
>>>
>>> Dear CWG members and participants
>>>
>>> There are structural and legal terms used in the draft which are
>>> incoherent and incompatible with each other. This has been subject to
>>> exchange of tens of mails among members.
>>>
>>> Having totally rejected the counter comments made by one participant, on
>>> the one hand, and having understood that except one person, everybody else
>>> agreed that the comments that I made are relevant and valid.
>>>
>>> Now, in reply to the comprehensive message and appeals made by various
>>> distinguish colleagues on mailing list and off list and having carefully
>>> considered the reasons given by our Chair Jonathan, and being always
>>> supportive of reaching compromise, in the interest of transition process, I
>>> joint the consensus emerged and have no objection to proceed with the
>>> approval of the draft
>>>
>>> I hope this will put on record that we need to understand each other
>>> problem and be collaborative to the maximum possible extent
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160809/51e0ebdb/attachment-0001.html>