[CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement

[Greg Shatan]

I think that, because this is a "Community Agreement" and there are
references to the three communities, it was thought best to keep this
reference.  There have been no objections from the numbers community reps
(or anyone else).

CWG Legal counsel is reviewing both ICANN and the EC as potential
signatories.  I don't believe ICANN legal has been asked about either, but
they probably should be asked.  I'll take that up on the Client Committee
list.

Greg

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the share, not sure of the need for (...or the “Numbers
> Community”...) Since the NRO is already indicated. Nevertheless, that may
> be within the numbers community to decide on.
>
> As to the names entity, can we check with legal on whether there will be
> any illegality if ICANN signs?
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On 10 Aug 2016 15:52, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I am forwarding a revised version of the Community Agreement, prepared
>> primarily by the IETF Trust's counsel.  Please reply if you have any
>> further comments on this draft.  Please note that everyone (including the
>> CWG) will have the opportunity to comment during the Public Comment period,
>> which is set to begin *Thursday*.
>>
>> The major open issue is the entity that will be the signatory for the
>> names community.  It would be good to resolve this, even provisionally, so
>> that it may part of the document when sent out for public comment.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM
>> Subject: Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement
>> To: Client <cwg-client at icann.org>
>>
>>
>> Client Committee,
>>
>> Here is a revised version of the Community Agreement.
>>
>> Greg
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal at att.net>
>> Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM
>> Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement
>> To: "iana-ipr at nro.net" <iana-ipr at nro.net>
>>
>>
>> All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting
>> feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from
>> CWG and IETF.  I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look
>> forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jorge
>>
>> Jorge L. Contreras
>> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
>> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
>> Washington, DC 20036
>> contreraslegal at att.net
>>
>> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and
>> confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this
>> message immediately.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>> Iana-ipr at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160810/bac77791/attachment.html>