[CWG-Stewardship] [Iana-ipr] [contreraslegal at att.net: Final documents]

[Greg Shatan]

Spoiler Alert:  It's ICANN (in brackets) (i.e., [ICANN]).  Along with a
footnote.

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think the CWG contribution (limited to the names community signatory)
> will be available almost immediately after our call, which was supposed to
> end two minutes ago.
>
> Greg
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> As an occasional member of this group, I wanted to voice my opinion that
>> it is very important that these documents move forward to a public comment
>> process today. We on the IETF Trust side have a similar situation in that
>> we also need to be ready to send them forward for community review. Our
>> meeting on that is about to start and I plan to do all I can to make that
>> happen. (And that meeting is the only reason I am not joining your call, as
>> our meetings run at the same time.)
>>
>> I also wanted to say that I agree with the process as outlined by
>> Jonathan and am personally happy with the latest document versions.
>>
>> I also wanted to thank everyone who has been involved in the process, it
>> has been quite intensive last few weeks. Thanks Greg for your hard work,
>> the lawyers, Jonathan & Lise, and thank you Kavouss for joining the
>> consensus and understanding how important this is. It is wonderful to see
>> how everyone is working hard to do the right thing, as always. And getting
>> it done!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jari
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160811/3c536b01/attachment.html>