[CWG-Stewardship] Proposed Footnote to inclusion of ICANN as potential signatory on behalf of Names Community

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Grec
This is my suggestion
Kavouss
*CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory
to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. ICANN has been
included in this draft.  ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject
to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.*

2016-08-11 18:16 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:

> All,
>
> As discussed, the following is the proposed footnote to accompany the
> inclusion of ICANN (in square brackets to indicate the non-final nature of
> that proposal) as the potential signatory to the Community Agreement on
> behalf of the Names Community.
>
> This will need to be finalized in the next 1-2 hours so that the documents
> can be put out for public comment today.  No objections were heard on
> today's call.  Any violent objections or genius revisions should be sent in
> reply to this email.
>
> *CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory
> to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.  At the
> request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as
> the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names
> Community and ICANN has been included in this draft.  ICANN (or another
> counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by
> CWG-Stewardship.*
>
> Greg
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160811/abc5101f/attachment.html>