[CWG-Stewardship] Proposed Footnote to inclusion of ICANN as potential signatory on behalf of Names Community

[Kavouss Arasteh]

I am sorry , once again we state something which does not reflect the
reality.
20 people shall not represent the entire community
You taking an unfair position and pushing for your own position
WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS INAPPROPRIATE.
Your unilateral conclusions supported by Beckie and Andrew DID GET THE
AGREEMENT OF THE ENTIRE 130 PEOPLE of CWG
we need to  have  at least 60 participants
I am not going to get in another battle with any one
We fabricate a conclusion which is false and untrue
regards
Kavouss


2016-08-11 19:32 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:

> Kavouss, thank you for your comment.  However, Andrew is correct, so we
> can't delete that sentence and still include ICANN as the proposed
> signatory.  I regret that your comment cannot be accommodated.
>
> As Andrew also notes, this is the last open item before the documents are
> set out for public comment.  So that the process may move forward, I've now
> sent the proposed signatory and the footnote to the IANA IPR email list so
> the documents can be finalized and distributed.
>
> Greg
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sam was quite clear that the agreement to put ICANN in there requires
>> a note that this was at the request of the CWG.
>>
>> A
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 06:42:49PM +0200, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>> > Grec
>> > This is my suggestion
>> > Kavouss
>> > *CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the
>> signatory
>> > to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. ICANN has
>> been
>> > included in this draft.  ICANN (or another counterparty) would be
>> subject
>> > to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.*
>> >
>> > 2016-08-11 18:16 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > As discussed, the following is the proposed footnote to accompany the
>> > > inclusion of ICANN (in square brackets to indicate the non-final
>> nature of
>> > > that proposal) as the potential signatory to the Community Agreement
>> on
>> > > behalf of the Names Community.
>> > >
>> > > This will need to be finalized in the next 1-2 hours so that the
>> documents
>> > > can be put out for public comment today.  No objections were heard on
>> > > today's call.  Any violent objections or genius revisions should be
>> sent in
>> > > reply to this email.
>> > >
>> > > *CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the
>> signatory
>> > > to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.  At the
>> > > request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could
>> serve as
>> > > the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names
>> > > Community and ICANN has been included in this draft.  ICANN (or
>> another
>> > > counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined
>> by
>> > > CWG-Stewardship.*
>> > >
>> > > Greg
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> > > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160811/46dc2927/attachment.html>