[CWG-Stewardship] Proposed Footnote to inclusion of ICANN as potential signatory on behalf of Names Community

[Seun Ojedeji]

"...*ICANN** has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the
Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community*..."

I did not stay all through the meeting so may have missed that part where
ICANN confirmed this, It's good to know.  FWIW, I believe Greg's text
accurately captures the current status.

Regards
On 11 Aug 2016 17:16, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> As discussed, the following is the proposed footnote to accompany the
> inclusion of ICANN (in square brackets to indicate the non-final nature of
> that proposal) as the potential signatory to the Community Agreement on
> behalf of the Names Community.
>
> This will need to be finalized in the next 1-2 hours so that the documents
> can be put out for public comment today.  No objections were heard on
> today's call.  Any violent objections or genius revisions should be sent in
> reply to this email.
>
> *CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory
> to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.  At the
> request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as
> the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names
> Community and ICANN has been included in this draft.  ICANN (or another
> counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by
> CWG-Stewardship.*
>
> Greg
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160811/2fde7d3e/attachment.html>