[CWG-Stewardship] [client com] Signatory to the Community Agreement

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Greg.  Would it be feasible to start with one option, e.g., ICANN, and transition to another option later, thereby allowing time to implement one that would take more time?

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:55 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] [client com] Signatory to the Community Agreement

All,

Please see below and attached for information from Sidley regarding potential signatories to the IANA IPR Community Agreement.

Greg

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Flanagan, Sharon <sflanagan at sidley.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sflanagan at sidley.com');>>
Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2016
Subject: [client com] Signatory to the Community Agreement
To: "jrobinson at afilias.info<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jrobinson at afilias.info');>" <jrobinson at afilias.info<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jrobinson at afilias.info');>>
Cc: Client <cwg-client at icann.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-client at icann.org');>>

Dear Client Committee,

Attached is a table highlighting some of the advantages and disadvantages of the various potential signatories to the IPR community agreement.

Best regards,
Sharon
SHARON R. FLANAGAN


SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
+1 415 772 1271
sflanagan at sidley.com<mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com>

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 3:25 AM
To: Flanagan, Sharon; Hofheimer, Joshua T.
Cc: Gregory, Holly; Client
Subject: Signatory to the Community Agreement

Dear Sidley,

As you are aware:


1.      A key issue for the CWG in dealing with the IANA IPR will be a decision on the signatory on behalf of the Names Community.

2.      Currently we have some potential options:

a.      ICANN as signatory (assuming ICANN is willing)

b.      The formation of an unincorporated entity (a to be defined)

c.      Other possibilities such as the Empowered Community

It will be helpful to the CWG to have some structured input on this, possibly in the form of a table, in order to inform and aid that decision.
Please can you provide such input and/or advice and indicate if this will be possible at the meeting of the CWG scheduled for tomorrow (18 August) @ 06h00 UTC.

Thank-you,


Jonathan
(on behalf of the Client Committee)



****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160818/f8449262/attachment.html>