[CWG-Stewardship] ICANN-PTI Services Agreement

[Paul M Kane - CWG]

Thanks Trang

I have been asking members of the ccTLD community for their guidance on the
draft Agreement and to make sure they are satisfied with Annex C being
incorporated. (I have yet to read the latest draft).

Also the CWG asked that I seek clarification as to what was meant by the opening
remarks in Section 1.

The comments I received by email were:


"Bottom line is the vast majority ccTLDs do not want to appoint ICANN in charge
of their enteries in the ROOT zone - (some ccTLDs - around 10 have agreements
with ICANN which does outline the relationship - such as .AU) but the 240+
others don't!"

Where has this been respected/recognised please?

I have subsequently been asked (as the original person advocating) by a
different ccTLD Rep for a status report regarding the promised end-to-end
automation for an updates to the Root Zone... 

I have said that this is not part of the transition and may occur later, but I'd
welcome ICANN/IANA's response just to accurately convey the message to the ccTLD
Community.

Thanks 

Paul
  


Quoting Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org>:

> All,
> 
> Please see attached a draft of the ICANN-PTI services agreement.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Trang
> 
>