[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA Meeting #75 - 21 January 2016

Thu Jan 21 17:52:57 UTC 2016

Dear all, 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting #75 on 21 January 2016 will be
available here:  https://community.icann.org/x/WYxlAw

A copy of the notes and action items may be found below.

Kind regards,

Brenda

Action Items

Action item: CWG-Stewardship to consider the role of ICANN staff in the implementation of IANA IPR
issues

Action item: Staff to distribute CG tracking of CCWG work to the mailing list. CWG-Stewardship to
review and provide input.

Action item: CWG-Stewardship to review current wording in relation to IRP for suitability and
communicate feedback to the CCWG- Accountability as soon as possible.  Chairs to circulate current
wording to the list.

Action item: Take input on list as to the requirements for the IPR consistent with prior work and
recommendations to the CCWG-Accountability.

Action item: Staff to circulate overview of questions and draft responses on the draft Bylaws to the
CWG-Stewardship.

Action item: CWG-Stewardship to review document and provide input on list. 

Action item: CWG-Stewardship to ensure that bylaws derived from the work of the CWG-Stewardship are
appropriately sized and fit for purpose.

Notes

1. Opening Remarks 

*        Primary objectives of the call are 1) update on implementation from ICANN staff, 2)
confirming plan for IPR work, 3) co-ordination with CCWG-Accountability, 4) work on the Bylaws.

*        Call may not take 2 hours

2. Implementation Update  

*        See slides provided by staff

*        May need to consider role of staff in the implementation of IANA IPR - could be considered
under item 3

*        What is the status of the collection of statistics to measure SLEs? Intended to be provided
by the middle December - did not meet 
that deadline. Now foreseen for end of January (on track). Preliminary report from contractor is
being reviewed by staff as it requests 
certain assumptions to be validated.

Action item: CWG-Stewardship to consider the role of ICANN staff in the implementation of IANA IPR
issues

3. IANA IPR 

*        Discussed in December as well as previous meeting. Functional neutrality (owner must
operate in such a way that control is not 
steered by one of the operational communities over the exclusion of others) deemed acceptable based
on those discussions, not 
necessary to create a whole new entity, logical option is to use the IETF Trust provided no
substantial issues emerge in the future. 

*        Confirm that there are no objections to this approach. No objections received so the
CWG-Stewardship will proceed on this basis.

*        Discuss how the different operational communities can collaborate on the implementation of
this solution. Utilize the group that has 
been operating to co-ordinate on this topic consisting of representatives of the different
operational communities, plus Greg and 
Chairs of CWG-Stewardship. Objective is to flesh out the principle and example terms under which the
different 
communities would have their relationships with the IETF Trust in relation to IANA IPR. Group has
agreed to make all of its 
future email conversations public. Notes of previous meetings have been circulated. Target is to
reach agreement on high 
level principles in advance of submission of the ICG proposal to the NTIA. 

4. CCWG-Accountability 

*        Communicated to CCWG-Accountability that some issues that needed to be worked further
including budget and appeal mechanisms. 

*        CCWG-Accountability is working hard on these issues with staff tracking the implementation
and review of CWG-Stewardship 
items. Intensive work plan from CCWG-Accountability has resulted in request to CWG-Stewardship
Chairs to review progress. CWG-Stewardship have instead suggested to share the documents with the
CWG-Stewardship list to allow for input by the whole 
group, noting that turnaround time is short.

*        Budget item has already had its second reading - 3 responses received from the group which
all have been sent to the CCWG-Accountability. Chairs suggest that Chuck as Chair of DT-O connects
with the CCWG-Accountability leads on this topic (Jordan Carter and Jonathan Zuck) who are now
tasked with writing the revised language 
in the proposal. Chuck agreed to take on this task.

*        Staff is working on a document that is tracking the CWG-Stewardship requirements which was
presented during the meeting. 
Consider adding a column on the end to be able to note concerns or suggestions. 

*        Becky Burr has reached out to some of the RySG participants on the IRP question. Community
needs to have the ability through 
the community mechanisms to use the IRP if the PTI does not deliver on its obligations. Proposed
bylaw changes currently do not 
refer to PTI (that ICANN is required to enforce contract with PTI). Could consider suggesting making
the language more specific. 
Critical to be clear on what requirements are, but need to be careful to not open this up to
redesign, need to be consistent with 
original recommendations and escalation mechanisms provided - only if those do not work, independent
review needs to be available. 

Action item: Staff to distribute CG tracking of CCWG work to the mailing list. CWG-Stewardship to
review and provide input.

Action item: CWG-Stewardship to review current wording in relation to IRP for suitability and
communicate feedback to the CCWG-Accountability as soon as possible.  Chairs to circulate current
wording to the list.

Action item: Take input on list as to the requirements for the IPR consistent with prior work and
recommendations to the CCWG-Accountability.

5. ICANN Bylaws relating to CWG-Stewardship

*        Design team leads contributed to the answers provided to Sidley where possible. Staff
identified questions that were still left 
open and requiring CWG-Stewardship review. First reading of the document during this meeting, with
second reading foreseen for the next meeting.

*        Risk to embody stuff in bylaws that should be dealt with elsewhere such as statement of
work and contract between ICANN and PTI. 

*        Answers to questions provide comprehensive view of the intended outcome - Sidley will
review this and is expected to developed 
a slimmed down version of the Bylaws based on the input provided.

Action item: Staff to circulate overview of questions and draft responses on the draft Bylaws to the
CWG-Stewardship.

Action item: CWG-Stewardship to review document and provide input on list. 

Action item: CWG-Stewardship to ensure that bylaws derived from the work of the CWG-Stewardship are
appropriately sized and fit for purpose.

6. AOB 

*	Next meeting scheduled for Thursday 4 February at 16.00 UTC.
*	Update on status of replacement of ccNSO member? To be communicated shortly.

7. Closing Remarks 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160121/2b3d9c39/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160121/2b3d9c39/image003-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 378 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160121/2b3d9c39/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160121/2b3d9c39/smime-0001.p7s>