[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations

[Lise Fuhr]

Full support for going ahead asap.
Lise

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: 15 June 2016 09:36
To: 'Gomes, Chuck'; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Cc: 'Maher, David'
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations

Chuck,

Thank-you. Lise and I had talked about getting this dealt as an instruction coming out of the next CWG meeting.
However, I take your point that it would be good to get it answered in time for the meeting if possible.

Are there any objections to referring this to Sidley immediately?

Jonathan

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
Sent: 14 June 2016 01:10
To: jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>; cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Cc: Maher, David <dmaher at pir.org<mailto:dmaher at pir.org>>
Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations

Jonathan,

Please note the following input I received on this from David Maher in the RySG:

"In the Sidley draft legal memo regarding PTI and ICANN (April 18, 2015), they say:
"This will ensure that the IANA naming functions is both functionally and legally "ring fenced" from the ICANN entity."
The  proposed secondment of virtually all PTI personnel from ICANN appears to me to pose a legal risk that PTI would not be considered a separate corporation under California law. I suggest that Sidley be asked to look into this. "

As David suggests, I think it would be very good if the client committee requested Sidley to look into this as soon as possible so that we could have their response prior to our next CWG meeting.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 1:16 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations

All,

FYI.

Please note We did not have an IOTF call today so have not yet had the opportunity to discuss this item.

Jonathan

From: Yuko Green [mailto:yuko.green at icann.org]
Sent: 10 June 2016 18:05
To: iotf at icann.org<mailto:iotf at icann.org>
Subject: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations

Dear members of the IOTF,

Attached, please find the rationale for PTI staffing recommendations we have made in the PTI Implementation Approach document. We look forward to hearing any feedback you may have.

Regards,

Yuko Green
Strategic Programs Manager
Global Domains Division
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct Line:  +1 310 578 8693
Mobile: +1 310 745 1517
E-mail:  yuko.green at icann.org<mailto:yuko.green at icann.org>
www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160615/68fbf3c4/attachment-0001.html>