[CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Implementation

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond]

+1 I also support - and if I may add, I attended the session today and
was very surprised that the stage was just populated by ICANN Staff. I
have concerns that this kind of fumble is exactly the kind of thing that
breeds lack of trust so I am pleased to see the proposal Jonathan has
shared with us.
Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 07/03/2016 17:09, Greg Shatan wrote:
> I support this as well.
>
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Lindeberg, Elise
> <elise.lindeberg at nkom.no <mailto:elise.lindeberg at nkom.no>> wrote:
>
>     Also in support !
>
>      
>
>     Elise
>
>      
>
>      
>
>     Elise Lindeberg
>
>     Senior Legal Adviser
>
>     Norwegian GAC representative
>
>     Norwegian Communications Authority
>
>     Dir. +47 22 824607 <tel:%2B47%2022%20824607> Mob. +47 90190947
>     <tel:%2B47%2090190947>
>
>     ekl at nkom.no <mailto:ekl at nkom.no>
>
>      
>
>      
>
>     *Fra:*cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>
>     [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *På vegne av* Jian C.
>     Chang
>     *Sendt:* 7. mars 2016 17:06
>     *Til:* Eduardo Diaz; jrobinson at afilias.info
>     <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>; cwg-stewardship
>     *Emne:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Implementation
>
>      
>
>     Agree and support Jonathan's proposal. 
>
>      
>
>     +1 to Mathew, not DT lead too, but will be happy to participate in
>     the task force if necessary.
>
>      
>
>     Jian Chang
>
>     KNET
>
>      
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          
>
>         *From:* Eduardo Diaz <mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>
>
>         *Date:* 2016-03-07 23:56
>
>         *To:* jrobinson <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>;
>         cwg-stewardship <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>
>         *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Implementation
>
>         I do support this proposal.
>
>          
>
>         Thanks for being so attentive to these details.
>
>          
>
>         -ed
>
>         On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:13 PM Jonathan Robinson
>         <jrobinson at afilias.info <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>> wrote:
>
>             All,
>
>              
>
>             Lise and I today attended the session entitled:
>
>              
>
>             https://meetings.icann.org/en/marrakech55/schedule/mon-iana-stewardship-implementation
>
>              
>
>             It became clear during the course of the session that
>             material new details on the implementation of the CWG
>             Stewardship proposal were being released for the first time.
>
>              
>
>             This raises two issues:
>
>              
>
>             1.      Process – How do we ensure that ICANN
>             implementation staff do not get out of synchronisation
>             with the CWG?
>
>             2.      Substance – Do we agree with the details presented
>             in the session today?
>
>              
>
>             Both Lise and I stood up and made points to this effect
>             during the meeting as did some of the CWG Stewardship
>             Members / Participants.
>
>             We also spoke with Akram & Trang afterwards. It does seem
>             that this was an inadvertent oversight driven by a desire
>             and need to make progress.
>
>              
>
>             However, it is also evident that there is a need for the
>             ICANN staff implementation team to have more rapid or
>             agile reference to the CWG, in addition to our bi-weekly
>             updates / meetings.
>
>              
>
>             Therefore, in order to address this need, the co-chairs
>             propose to form an *implementation oversight task force*
>             comprising the CWG co-chairs and the DT leads. The
>             outcomes will come back to the CWG in any case but we
>             believe that we need a capability to track the
>             implementation work as closely as possible and as it evolves.
>
>              
>
>             Please can we have any comments or concerns with this
>             proposal as soon as possible.
>
>              
>
>             Thank-you,
>
>              
>
>              
>
>             Lise and Jonathan
>
>             Co-Chairs, CWG Stewardship
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>             CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>     CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160307/ba22d7c4/attachment-0001.html>